Bug 724637 (BRMS-545) - Enable ruleflow-group in Test Sceanrio
Summary: Enable ruleflow-group in Test Sceanrio
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE
Alias: BRMS-545
Product: JBoss Enterprise BRMS Platform 5
Classification: JBoss
Component: BRM (Guvnor)
Version: 5.1.0 GA
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
high
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
: BRMS 5.2.0.GA
Assignee: Tihomir Surdilovic
QA Contact:
URL: http://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/BRM...
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2011-01-26 03:22 UTC by Toshiya Kobayashi
Modified: 2011-09-22 03:38 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
When running test scenarios in BRMS it was not possible to turn off RuleFlow. An "Activate rule flow group" option has been added making it possible to specify which ruleflow-groups should be activated when running test scenarios.
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-05-27 18:33:36 UTC
Type: Bug


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Issue Tracker BRMS-545 0 Major Closed Enable ruleflow-group in Test Sceanrio 2014-09-04 11:34:37 UTC

Description Toshiya Kobayashi 2011-01-26 03:22:52 UTC
Help Desk Ticket Reference: https://c.na7.visual.force.com/apex/Case_View?id=500A0000006GJWh&sfdc.override=1
securitylevel_name: Public

This is platform JIRA for [GUVNOR-474] In test scenarios. (Changed title for better explanation)
GUVNOR-474 was a feature request, but reopened as (most likely) regression. So I marked this JIRA as a bug.

Comment 1 Toshiya Kobayashi 2011-01-26 03:23:36 UTC
Link: Added: This issue incorporates GUVNOR-474


Comment 2 lcarlon 2011-08-25 03:29:30 UTC
It is not clear from the comments here, https://issues.jboss.org/browse/GUVNOR-474, or https://issues.jboss.org/browse/BRMS-545, how this was resolved, please provide Cause, Consequence, Fix, Result for the release notes.

Comment 3 lcarlon 2011-09-22 03:07:43 UTC
    Technical note added. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field
    accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team.
    
    New Contents:
When running test scenarios in BRMS it was not possible to turn of RuleFlow.

Comment 4 lcarlon 2011-09-22 03:09:27 UTC
    Technical note updated. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field
    accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team.
    
    Diffed Contents:
@@ -1 +1 @@
-When running test scenarios in BRMS it was not possible to turn of RuleFlow.+<remark>Need Info from Tihomir - How was this issue resolved? If by upgrading the component please let me know so I can add that to the release notes</remark></para><para>When running test scenarios in BRMS it was not possible to turn of RuleFlow.

Comment 5 Tihomir Surdilovic 2011-09-22 03:19:33 UTC
When specifying data inputs in test scenarios, users can now specify that a certain ruleflow-group should be also activates. This is done via a new "Activate rule flow group" option in the popup window when users add a new "Given" section to the test scenario.

Hope this helps.

Comment 6 lcarlon 2011-09-22 03:38:53 UTC
That's perfect, thanks tsurdilo.

Comment 7 lcarlon 2011-09-22 03:38:53 UTC
    Technical note updated. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field
    accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team.
    
    Diffed Contents:
@@ -1 +1 @@
-<remark>Need Info from Tihomir - How was this issue resolved? If by upgrading the component please let me know so I can add that to the release notes</remark></para><para>When running test scenarios in BRMS it was not possible to turn of RuleFlow.+When running test scenarios in BRMS it was not possible to turn off RuleFlow. An "Activate rule flow group" option has been added making it possible to specify which ruleflow-groups should be activated when running test scenarios.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.