Bug 726074 - Eye of GNOME does not recognize SVGZ files
Summary: Eye of GNOME does not recognize SVGZ files
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: eog
Version: 15
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Siddhesh Poyarekar
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2011-07-27 13:11 UTC by Bartosz Brachaczek
Modified: 2017-09-13 08:03 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-04-27 07:14:19 UTC
Type: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Bartosz Brachaczek 2011-07-27 13:11:24 UTC
Description of problem:
When I double-clik on an SVGZ file in Nautilus, it opens Eye of GNOME to display it. Though, Eye of GNOME fails and tells me it does not recognize the image format. Uncompressed SVG works just good. Firstly I reported it to GNOME (https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=655377). It turned out that native support for SVGZ was indeed missing but a developer told me it should still displayer using GdkPixbuf. And indeed when I tried Eye of GNOME 2.32.1 on my Gentoo installation, it was able to show SVGZ files.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
3.0.1

Expected results:
SVGZ files are recognized correctly. If it was anything to do with upstream, the bug is also fixed or at least reported upstream.

Comment 1 Felix Riemann 2011-08-03 16:01:35 UTC
To me it looks like F15's librsvg2 build is missing an upstream fix[1] to get the SVGZ support in the pixbuf loader working again. The output of gdk-pixbuf-query-loaders shows that the SVG loader doesn't report the SVGZ mimetype.

[1]: http://git.gnome.org/browse/librsvg/commit/?h=gnome-2-32&id=a243be19bd97579dfebdac8d6154d34b2c938531

Comment 2 Bartosz Brachaczek 2011-08-11 21:48:52 UTC
Yes, it is very likely.

Comment 3 Kalev Lember 2012-04-27 07:14:19 UTC
Hi,

Thanks for reporting this. Confirmed fixed as of Fedora 17, at least.

Comment 4 Alan Eliasen 2017-09-13 08:03:42 UTC
This is still a problem in FC26.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.