Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because
the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Description of problem:
ConnectStoragePool is taking more than 3 minutes (RHEVM defaults) on a sacle deployment (50 SDs) -FC
almost 3 minutes delay on this one:
Thread-21::DEBUG::2011-07-28 10:49:48,451::misc::1010::SamplingMethod::(__call__) Returning last result
Thread-21::INFO::2011-07-28 10:52:38,815::sp::797::Storage.StoragePool::(_linkStorageDomain) Linking /rhev/data-center/mnt/blockSD/7bf1cda0-874b-44cd-a6f8-f637
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
vdsm-4.9-86.el6.x86_64
How reproducible:
happened many times
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
Thread-21::INFO::2011-07-28 10:49:39,126::dispatcher::94::Storage.Dispatcher.Protect::(run) Run and protect: connectStoragePool, args: ( spUUID=aa2b15e3-2e59-4772-84d7-28964c81677f hostID=3 scsiKey=aa2b15e3-2e59-4772-84d7-28964c81677f msdUUID=9c84ff7e-7614-4425-863c-d242a6528aae masterVersion=538)
Thread-21::DEBUG::2011-07-28 Thread-21::INFO::2011-07-28 10:52:42,459::dispatcher::100::Storage.Dispatcher.Protect::(run) Run and protect: connectStoragePool, Return response: {'status': {'message': 'OK', 'code': 0}}
verified on 4.9-103. connect storage pool command on FC (block) pool with 50 domains takes 5ms.
Thread-301::INFO::2011-09-20 12:53:33,899::dispatcher::94::Storage.Dispatcher.Protect::(run) Run and protect: connectStoragePool, args: ( spUUID=441e76ab-6279-4cc4-a940-34afe72138b7 hostID=2 scsiKey=441e76ab-6279-4cc4-a940-34afe72138b7 msdUUID=7fce1e31-3397-4dc5-8b75-e81c06363648 masterVersion=140)
Thread-301::INFO::2011-09-20 12:53:33,904::dispatcher::100::Storage.Dispatcher.Protect::(run) Run and protect: connectStoragePool, Return response: {'status': {'message': 'OK', 'code': 0}}
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.
For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.
If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.
http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2011-1782.html
Description of problem: ConnectStoragePool is taking more than 3 minutes (RHEVM defaults) on a sacle deployment (50 SDs) -FC almost 3 minutes delay on this one: Thread-21::DEBUG::2011-07-28 10:49:48,451::misc::1010::SamplingMethod::(__call__) Returning last result Thread-21::INFO::2011-07-28 10:52:38,815::sp::797::Storage.StoragePool::(_linkStorageDomain) Linking /rhev/data-center/mnt/blockSD/7bf1cda0-874b-44cd-a6f8-f637 Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): vdsm-4.9-86.el6.x86_64 How reproducible: happened many times Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: Thread-21::INFO::2011-07-28 10:49:39,126::dispatcher::94::Storage.Dispatcher.Protect::(run) Run and protect: connectStoragePool, args: ( spUUID=aa2b15e3-2e59-4772-84d7-28964c81677f hostID=3 scsiKey=aa2b15e3-2e59-4772-84d7-28964c81677f msdUUID=9c84ff7e-7614-4425-863c-d242a6528aae masterVersion=538) Thread-21::DEBUG::2011-07-28 Thread-21::INFO::2011-07-28 10:52:42,459::dispatcher::100::Storage.Dispatcher.Protect::(run) Run and protect: connectStoragePool, Return response: {'status': {'message': 'OK', 'code': 0}}