Hide Forgot
Description of problem: ConnectStoragePool is taking more than 3 minutes (RHEVM defaults) on a sacle deployment (50 SDs) -FC almost 3 minutes delay on this one: Thread-21::DEBUG::2011-07-28 10:49:48,451::misc::1010::SamplingMethod::(__call__) Returning last result Thread-21::INFO::2011-07-28 10:52:38,815::sp::797::Storage.StoragePool::(_linkStorageDomain) Linking /rhev/data-center/mnt/blockSD/7bf1cda0-874b-44cd-a6f8-f637 Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): vdsm-4.9-86.el6.x86_64 How reproducible: happened many times Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: Thread-21::INFO::2011-07-28 10:49:39,126::dispatcher::94::Storage.Dispatcher.Protect::(run) Run and protect: connectStoragePool, args: ( spUUID=aa2b15e3-2e59-4772-84d7-28964c81677f hostID=3 scsiKey=aa2b15e3-2e59-4772-84d7-28964c81677f msdUUID=9c84ff7e-7614-4425-863c-d242a6528aae masterVersion=538) Thread-21::DEBUG::2011-07-28 Thread-21::INFO::2011-07-28 10:52:42,459::dispatcher::100::Storage.Dispatcher.Protect::(run) Run and protect: connectStoragePool, Return response: {'status': {'message': 'OK', 'code': 0}}
Created attachment 515727 [details] vdsm-log
http://gerrit.usersys.redhat.com/#change,832
verified on 4.9-103. connect storage pool command on FC (block) pool with 50 domains takes 5ms. Thread-301::INFO::2011-09-20 12:53:33,899::dispatcher::94::Storage.Dispatcher.Protect::(run) Run and protect: connectStoragePool, args: ( spUUID=441e76ab-6279-4cc4-a940-34afe72138b7 hostID=2 scsiKey=441e76ab-6279-4cc4-a940-34afe72138b7 msdUUID=7fce1e31-3397-4dc5-8b75-e81c06363648 masterVersion=140) Thread-301::INFO::2011-09-20 12:53:33,904::dispatcher::100::Storage.Dispatcher.Protect::(run) Run and protect: connectStoragePool, Return response: {'status': {'message': 'OK', 'code': 0}}
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2011-1782.html