Bug 726597
| Summary: | BRMS jars improperly named | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [JBoss] JBoss Enterprise BRMS Platform 5 | Reporter: | Lukáš Petrovický <lpetrovi> |
| Component: | Build Process | Assignee: | Ryan Zhang <rzhang> |
| Status: | CLOSED UPSTREAM | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | high | ||
| Version: | BRMS 5.2.0-ER1 | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | BRMS 5.2.0.GA | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2025-02-10 03:14:05 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Lukáš Petrovický
2011-07-29 07:33:33 UTC
This would be easy to fix. Just to want to confirm, we have added "-ER2" ... suffix in the drools jars version in order to avoiding version overlapping in MEAD env. So the "-ER/CR“ suffix shall be ok , right? I think that should be no problem at all. Also please make sure that the jBPM JARs have a proper suffix. (Currently they're suffixed with "SOA".) So far it looks good. I will wait for final verification once we get the CR bits. Just noticed that even with ER3, jBPM still has the "5.1.0" suffix - I think this needs to be changed to 5.2.0. OK, I would update jbpm to 5.2.0.BRMS too in next release. I had thought that it would be wise to follow the project's major version number. Verified in ER4 This product has been discontinued or is no longer tracked in Red Hat Bugzilla. |