Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

Bug 7291

Summary:	kdbg and kdevelop on 6.x boxes
Product:	[Retired] Red Hat Raw Hide	Reporter:	ted
Component:	kdeutils	Assignee:	Bernhard Rosenkraenzer <bero>
Status:	CLOSED RAWHIDE	QA Contact:
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	1.0
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	i386
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2000-02-15 10:50:14 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description ted 1999-11-24 14:47:20 UTC

Hello,

I have downloaded the following packages from the rawhide powertools
directory for my RedHat 6.x boxes:

kdbg-1.0.0-1.i386.rpm
kdevelop-1.0beta4.1-1.i386.rpm

On a 6.0 box, the documentation is installed by default under
/usr/share/doc/HTML. There is no kdelibs-devel packages (at least not for
kde 1.1.1 as far as I have seen). On a 6.1 box, the documentation is
installed by default under /usr/doc/kde/HTML (some remains under
/usr/share/doc/HTML).

As a result, the package could correctly install the documentation for a
6.0 box if the package kdelibs-devel would be there or, recognised as such.
Under RedHat 6.1, the documentation is simply not found because it is not
where it is supposed to be. This is quite annoying in both cases. I don't
see why between 6.0 and 6.1 the documentation has moved ! ...

Could you please generate usable packages for 6.0 and 6.1 or mention the
differences somewhere and present a clean way with rpm to get rid of these
stupid problems.

Thanks in advance

		Daniel Tourde

Comment 1 Bernhard Rosenkraenzer 1999-11-28 13:32:59 UTC

Will be fixed with the next kdevelop package.
(The documentation  *should* go to /usr/doc/kde - kdevelop just hasn't been
rebuilt for 6.1 yet).

Comment 2 Bernhard Rosenkraenzer 2000-02-15 10:50:59 UTC

Fixed in 1.1-1