Hide Forgot
Some people have been confused about the operation of --start & --stop in ccs. We need to explicitly say in the man page (and --help) that --start enables the cluster services and --stop disables them (as well as starts and stops them).
Updated man page (man ccs): --startall Start *AND* enable cluster services on on reboot on all nodes --stopall Stop *AND* disable cluster services on reboot for all nodes --start Start *AND* enable cluster services on reboot for host specified with -h --stop Stop *AND* disable cluster services on reboot for host specified with -h Updated usage (ccs -h): --startall Start *AND* enable cluster services on on reboot for all nodes --stopall Stop *AND* disable cluster services on reboot for all nodes --start Start *AND* enable cluster services on reboot for host specified with -h --stop Stop *AND* disable cluster services on reboot for host specified with -h Commit: https://github.com/feist/ccs/commit/af317f84dbadc70ad5727a3144d46d355748ba57
Using ricci-0.16.2-48.el6: [root@ask-04 tmp]# man ccs | head -n93 | tail -n13 --startall Start *AND* enable cluster services on on reboot on all nodes --stopall Stop *AND* disable cluster services on reboot for all nodes --start Start *AND* enable cluster services on reboot for host specified with -h --stop Stop *AND* disable cluster services on reboot for host specified with -h
Using ricci-0.16.2-49.el6: (fixed extra 'on' in --startall) [root@ask-04 ~]# man ccs | head -n93 | tail -n13 --startall Start *AND* enable cluster services on reboot on all nodes --stopall Stop *AND* disable cluster services on reboot for all nodes --start Start *AND* enable cluster services on reboot for host specified with -h --stop Stop *AND* disable cluster services on reboot for host specified with -h
Technical note added. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team. New Contents: No documentation needed.
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0898.html