Description of problem: Currently the "Product's Subscription Details" panel in the subscription-manager gui assumes that only one subscription is covering a product. Now that we can stack subscriptions so as to satisfy socket compliance on a product, more than one covering subscription should be listed in the details. See screenshots attached. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): [root@jsefler-onprem-62server ~]# rpm -qa | grep subscription-manager subscription-manager-0.96.8-1.git.22.6521906.el6.x86_64 subscription-manager-firstboot-0.96.8-1.git.22.6521906.el6.x86_64 subscription-manager-gnome-0.96.8-1.git.22.6521906.el6.x86_64
Created attachment 521975 [details] see text in the screenshot showing the incomplete info listing only one of the subscriptions used to satisfy the compliance of the installed product.
Created attachment 521976 [details] see the screenhot for the circled subscriptions that were stacked to satisfy compliance of the installed product
Committed to master branch 11a493d483738787fa7a616d49f9400d51213d13
Created attachment 551946 [details] screenshot showing multiple subscriptions/contracts for which product is subscribed Verifing fix from master branch... [root@jsefler-onprem-5server ~]# rpm -q subscription-manager-gnome subscription-manager-gnome-0.99.3-1.git.8.11a493d.el5 In the screenshot you will see four subscription/contract for which I manually subscribed to achieve a "green" status. This looks correct. Please merge this fix to the RHEL5.8 branch for final verification. Moving back to ASSIGNED
RHEL5.8 commit 2da1fc03cf757867a2ade4580bc9e6b745c247d8
Created attachment 552248 [details] screenshot showing multiple subscriptions/contracts for which product is subscribed Verifying fix from RHEL5.8 branch... [root@jsefler-onprem-5server ~]# rpm -q subscription-manager-gnome subscription-manager-gnome-0.98.11-1.git.2.2da1fc0.el5 In the screenshot you will see six subscription/contract for which I manually subscribed to achieve a "green" status. Although excessive on my part, this is correct. Moving to VERIFIED
Technical note added. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team. New Contents: No description necessary
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0154.html