RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 737675 - Certificate Location accessibility name changes
Summary: Certificate Location accessibility name changes
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: subscription-manager
Version: 6.2
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Bryan Kearney
QA Contact: Entitlement Bugs
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 756082 771481
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2011-09-12 20:55 UTC by J.C. Molet
Modified: 2013-01-10 10:55 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-11-13 21:46:26 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description J.C. Molet 2011-09-12 20:55:06 UTC 
Description of problem:
In the Import Certificate dialog in subscription-manager-gui, the certificate chooser button changes names depending on what cert is selected

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
subscription-manager-gnome-0.96.9-1.git.10.adab5e3.el6.x86_64

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.  Start rhsm-gui
2.  Go to import-certificate
3.  Using an accessibility tool (such as dogtail/sniff) note that the certificate chooser button is named "(None)"
4.  Choose a certificate using the chooser
5.  Note that both the button name and label have changed.

  
Actual results:
Both the button name and label change upon every selection of a certificate.

Expected results:
The label for this button should change but not the name of the button.
Comment 1 James Bowes 2011-09-30 17:37:31 UTC 
JC, that widget is a stock gtk composite widget, made of the button and its sibling dropdown. Both of those aren't immediately or easily accessible in code to modify their a11y strings. you should be able to use the reference to their parent widget (the file chooser button itself) for a11y access/manipulation. its a11y name is certificate_chooser_button. Will that work for you?
Comment 2 J.C. Molet 2011-10-05 12:44:45 UTC 
Hi James,

The certificate_chooser_button is of object type "filler" and does not have any action interface  (where a normal button will have "press release click").  Although it has the properties "Sensitive" and "Focusable" you can't directly interact with it.

Having said that, I believe I can work around this in my automation either by predicting what the button name would be, or by restarting the gui for every use of this menu.  This wouldn't work for a normal accessibility use case though.
Comment 3 Bryan Kearney 2012-02-10 15:28:25 UTC 
Is there anything to do here, or close this out?
Comment 6 RHEL Program Management 2012-07-10 08:49:09 UTC 
This request was not resolved in time for the current release.
Red Hat invites you to ask your support representative to
propose this request, if still desired, for consideration in
the next release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux.
Comment 7 RHEL Program Management 2012-07-11 02:07:48 UTC 
This request was erroneously removed from consideration in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.4, which is currently under development.  This request will be evaluated for inclusion in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.4.
Comment 8 Bryan Kearney 2012-11-13 21:46:26 UTC 
Per Comment 3, closing this out.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.