RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 739047 - Update against RHN Live-selinux Test fails
Summary: Update against RHN Live-selinux Test fails
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: selinux-policy
Version: 6.2
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
low
low
Target Milestone: alpha
: ---
Assignee: Miroslav Grepl
QA Contact: Milos Malik
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2011-09-16 12:04 UTC by Iveta Wiedermann
Modified: 2012-09-22 07:26 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version: selinux-policy-3.7.19-112.el6
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-12-06 10:19:03 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2011:1511 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE selinux-policy bug fix and enhancement update 2011-12-06 00:39:17 UTC

Description Iveta Wiedermann 2011-09-16 12:04:14 UTC 
Description of problem: while there were running tps jobs, it failed with this message:

Running: /sbin/ausearch -sv no -m AVC -ts 09/16/2011 03:40:17 SELinux Check: FAIL SELinux AVC messages found: type=1400 audit(1316158860.115:39690): avc: denied { signull } for pid=21318 comm="who" scontext=unconfined_u:system_r:sblim_gatherd_t:s0 tcontext=unconfined_u:system_r:sshd_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 tclass=process type=1400 audit(1316158860.255:39691): avc: denied { search } for pid=21321 comm="ps" name="home" dev=sdb1 ino=2129921 scontext=unconfined_u:system_r:sblim_gatherd_t:s0 tcontext=system_u:object_r:home_root_t:s0 tclass=dir type=1400 audit(1316158888.795:39692): avc: denied { name_connect } for pid=2641 comm="polkitd" dest=111 scontext=system_u:system_r:policykit_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 tcontext=system_u:object_r:portmap_port_t:s0 tclass=tcp_socket


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
# rpm -qa selinux-policy\*
selinux-policy-doc-3.7.19-93.el6_1.7.noarch
selinux-policy-targeted-3.7.19-93.el6_1.7.noarch
selinux-policy-minimum-3.7.19-93.el6_1.7.noarch
selinux-policy-3.7.19-93.el6_1.7.noarch
selinux-policy-mls-3.7.19-93.el6_1.7.noarch


How reproducible:
Using below scenario

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Run tps-RHNqa job

  
Actual results:
SELinux AVC messages

Expected results:
No SELinux AVC messages expected
Comment 3 Milos Malik 2011-09-16 12:51:32 UTC 
The same problem leads to different AVCs:
----
time->Fri Sep 16 04:11:00 2011
type=SYSCALL msg=audit(1316160660.101:39741): arch=c000003e syscall=62 success=
yes exit=0 a0=725d a1=0 a2=1546030 a3=8 items=0 ppid=30359 pid=30360 auid=0 uid
=0 gid=0 euid=0 suid=0 fsuid=0 egid=0 sgid=0 fsgid=0 tty=(none) ses=4600 comm="who" exe="/usr/bin/who" subj=unconfined_u:system_r:sblim_gatherd_t:s0 key=(null)
type=AVC msg=audit(1316160660.101:39741): avc:  denied  { signull } for  pid=30360 comm="who" scontext=unconfined_u:system_r:sblim_gatherd_t:s0 tcontext=unconfined_u:system_r:sshd_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 tclass=process
----
time->Fri Sep 16 05:36:00 2011
type=SYSCALL msg=audit(1316165760.560:384): arch=40000003 syscall=270 success=y
es exit=0 a0=4b95 a1=4ba4 a2=6 a3=0 items=0 ppid=1 pid=19364 auid=0 uid=0 gid=0
 euid=0 suid=0 fsuid=0 egid=0 sgid=0 fsgid=0 tty=(none) ses=2917 comm="gatherd"
 exe="/usr/sbin/gatherd" subj=unconfined_u:system_r:sblim_gatherd_t:s0 key=(null)
type=AVC msg=audit(1316165760.560:384): avc:  denied  { signal } for  pid=19364 comm="gatherd" scontext=unconfined_u:system_r:sblim_gatherd_t:s0 tcontext=unconfined_u:system_r:sblim_gatherd_t:s0 tclass=process
----
time->Fri Sep 16 06:23:00 2011
type=SYSCALL msg=audit(1316168580.361:498): arch=40000003 syscall=195 success=yes exit=0 a0=12d7e0 a1=bf8b11ec a2=2ccff4 a3=3 items=0 ppid=19811 pid=19812 auid=0 uid=0 gid=0 euid=0 suid=0 fsuid=0 egid=0 sgid=0 fsgid=0 tty=(none) ses=2917 comm="ps" exe="/bin/ps" subj=unconfined_u:system_r:sblim_gatherd_t:s0 key=(null)
type=AVC msg=audit(1316168580.361:498): avc:  denied  { search } for  pid=19812 comm="ps" name=".vnc" dev=vda2 ino=1529157 scontext=unconfined_u:system_r:sblim_gatherd_t:s0 tcontext=unconfined_u:object_r:user_home_t:s0 tclass=dir
type=AVC msg=audit(1316168580.361:498): avc:  denied  { search } for  pid=19812 comm="ps" name="test" dev=vda2 ino=1528916 scontext=unconfined_u:system_r:sblim_gatherd_t:s0 tcontext=unconfined_u:object_r:user_home_dir_t:s0 tclass=dir
type=AVC msg=audit(1316168580.361:498): avc:  denied  { search } for  pid=19812 comm="ps" name="home" dev=vda2 ino=1528913 scontext=unconfined_u:system_r:sblim_gatherd_t:s0 tcontext=system_u:object_r:home_root_t:s0 tclass=dir
----
Comment 4 Milos Malik 2011-09-16 12:54:20 UTC 
Whatever runs these actions it's pretty invasive:
----
time->Fri Sep 16 06:02:00 2011
type=SYSCALL msg=audit(1316167320.360:30726): arch=80000015 syscall=106 success
=yes exit=0 a0=80fd4049a8 a1=ffffea81388 a2=ffffea81388 a3=7fffffff items=0 ppi
d=12854 pid=12855 auid=0 uid=0 gid=0 euid=0 suid=0 fsuid=0 egid=0 sgid=0 fsgid=
0 tty=(none) ses=5421 comm="ps" exe="/bin/ps" subj=unconfined_u:system_r:sblim_
gatherd_t:s0 key=(null)
type=AVC msg=audit(1316167320.360:30726): avc:  denied  { search } for  pid=12855 comm="ps" name="" dev=0:16 ino=2 scontext=unconfined_u:system_r:sblim_gatherd_t:s0 tcontext=system_u:object_r:nfs_t:s0 tclass=dir
----
Comment 5 Miroslav Grepl 2011-09-16 13:04:54 UTC 
Ok, sblim needs more fixes. 

Not sure why but I did not make only this new domain as unconfined domain which I need to fix.
Comment 7 Miroslav Grepl 2011-09-20 15:32:50 UTC 
Fixed in selinux-policy-3.7.19-112.el6
Comment 11 errata-xmlrpc 2011-12-06 10:19:03 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1511.html
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.