Bug 742062 - RFE: "Steal" button
Summary: RFE: "Steal" button
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED INSUFFICIENT_DATA
Alias: None
Product: Beaker
Classification: Retired
Component: web UI
Version: 0.7
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified vote
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Raymond Mancy
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard: MC
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2011-09-28 21:46 UTC by Sean Waite
Modified: 2014-12-08 01:09 UTC (History)
8 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-11-07 07:23:08 UTC


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Sean Waite 2011-09-28 21:46:37 UTC
Having the ability to "steal" a system from another user would be nice. Currently, if there is no user, there is a take button. For admins (and, I suppose, owners) of a system, if there is currently a user, having the ability to "steal" the system from the current user would be nice. It would probably be best if it bypassed the release action. Use case: System is having difficulty, so the user opens a ticket but still retains his user status. Admin comes along to fix it, and "steals" the system so that he has full control over it.

Comment 1 Raymond Mancy 2011-09-28 22:53:28 UTC
What particular functions have you found lacking as an Admin when a machine is assigned to another user?

Comment 2 Sean Waite 2011-09-29 14:07:39 UTC
In general, the ability to provision. It gets queued up behind the current user. This is sort of a pedantic thing, since I can just release it and take it, but I have to be careful to loan it to myself, first, so that another job doesn't jump in front. Three clicks, vs one click with the steal.

Also, I can't always guarantee that the user won't decide to "help" or to check up on the system in the middle of work on it, if we swipe the system from them they don't have the ability to muck around as much.

Comment 3 Min Shin 2012-11-07 07:23:08 UTC
This bugs is closed as it is either not in the current Beaker scope or we could not find sufficient data in the bug report for consideration.
Please feel free to reopen the bug with additional information and/or business cases behind it.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.