Bug 744845 - ERROR with rpm_check_debug vs depsolve
Summary: ERROR with rpm_check_debug vs depsolve
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
Classification: Red Hat
Component: yum
Version: 5.8
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Packaging Maintenance Team
QA Contact: BaseOS QE Security Team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2011-10-10 16:08 UTC by Jose Manuel Rodriguez
Modified: 2014-01-21 06:24 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-03-04 12:57:13 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Jose Manuel Rodriguez 2011-10-10 16:08:44 UTC
Description of problem:
ERROR with rpm_check_debug vs depsolve:
ibm-lotus-notes-symphony = 8.5.3-20110916.0921.1 is needed by ibm-lotus-templates-embedded-2:20110916-1.noarch
Please report this error at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Red$20Hat$20Enterprise$20Linux$206&component=yum

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
  
Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 1 James Antill 2011-10-11 19:58:44 UTC
Can you run: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest

Comment 2 Jose Manuel Rodriguez 2011-10-11 21:33:57 UTC
Hi James,

I executed the command, no output was shown:

[rumber@rumber:~/Downloads]# rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest
[rumber@rumber:~/Downloads]# 

I tried the Software Update again after I executed your suggested command and now everything was installed with no errors.

I do not know if the command solved something but I do not see the error anymore.

Thank you very much.
Jose Rodriguez

Comment 3 James Antill 2011-10-12 21:09:19 UTC
 Ok, that's weird ... are you sure nothing changed and it's the same machine?

 Also you logged this against RHEL-5, but the message implies that it's a RHEL-6 yum (because the link is for RHEL-6). Feel free to close though, as there's not much debugging I can do if it's started working :(.

Comment 4 Jose Manuel Rodriguez 2011-10-12 21:46:50 UTC
Yes, I did not changed anything and it is the same machine. I just finished the update of 2 packages a few seconds ago with no errors.

You are correct, I made a mistake because I have: Red Hat Enterprise Linux Workstation release 6.1 (Santiago).

Closing it and thank you very much!


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.