Hide Forgot
Description of problem: I have installed both 1.7 and 1.6 щзутовлб иге wsimport alternative missed for both: # LANG=C ls /etc/alternatives/wsimport* ls: cannot access /etc/alternatives/wsimport*: No such file or directory But it there: rpm -qf /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0.x86_64/bin/wsimport /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.0.x86_64/bin/wsimport java-1.6.0-openjdk-devel-1.6.0.0-59.1.10.3.fc16.x86_64 java-1.7.0-openjdk-devel-1.7.0.0-0.1.20110803.1.fc16.x86_64 Please add it. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): java-1.6.0-openjdk-devel-1.6.0.0-59.1.10.3.fc16.x86_64 java-1.7.0-openjdk-devel-1.7.0.0-0.1.20110803.1.fc16.x86_64
This message is a reminder that Fedora 16 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 4 (four) weeks from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 16. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '16'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 16's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 16 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora, you are encouraged to click on "Clone This Bug" and open it against that version of Fedora. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 19 development cycle. Changing version to '19'. (As we did not run this process for some time, it could affect also pre-Fedora 19 development cycle bugs. We are very sorry. It will help us with cleanup during Fedora 19 End Of Life. Thank you.) More information and reason for this action is here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping/Fedora19
This message is a notice that Fedora 19 is now at end of life. Fedora has stopped maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 19. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. Approximately 4 (four) weeks from now this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '19'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version. Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not able to fix it before Fedora 19 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora, you are encouraged change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete.
Fedora 19 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2015-01-06. Fedora 19 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. If you are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the current release. If you experience problems, please add a comment to this bug. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.
Problem still there.
Hi! For openjdk8, the wsimport seems to e ok with me. And currently feodra do not have any other official jdk then 8. IS this issue persistent onoly when you have more then one jdk installed? Thanx for patience.
At least there java-1.8.0-openjdk-devel-debug and java-1.8.0-openjdk-devel. And yes, external may be installed. By some reason you are still provide alternatives for java and javac commands. And for Fedora 22 there also java 7 present in repos.
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/java-1.8.0-openjdk.git/tree/java-1.8.0-openjdk.spec#n319 $ wsimport -version wsimport version "2.2.9" Works fine.
Still the same: # alternatives --config java There is 1 program that provides 'java'. Selection Command ----------------------------------------------- *+ 1 /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.8.0-openjdk-1.8.0.65-13.b17.fc23.x86_64/jre/bin/java Enter to keep the current selection[+], or type selection number: 1 # alternatives --config wsimport <empty>
Sorry no. wsimport is slave to java. It will never be separate alternatives config. If you check slaves for java and javac you will see that it do not have reason to provide individual masters. From thius point of view, it is close-notabug.
Sorry I do not understand what you call master. And why there no reasons provide alternatives for wsimport? Java 9 coming soon also. wsimport for major different versions produce incorrect sources - it is why I fill that bug. It is not esy handle alternatives or symlinks manually.
Hello, you make me confused (.. what I had missed...?..) a )slaves x masters wsimport is salve of master javac. See: http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/java-1.8.0-openjdk.git/tree/java-1.8.0-openjdk.spec#n343 Javac is master. When you swap javacs, you swap wsimports It have to be javac's slave, becasue it reside in devel subapackge It will never be master. b) is it missing? nope... ll /etc/alternatives/wsimport* lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 72 Jan 6 11:07 /etc/alternatives/wsimport -> /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.8.0-openjdk-1.8.0.65-13.b17.fc23.x86_64/bin/wsimport lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 80 Jan 6 11:07 /etc/alternatives/wsimport.1.gz -> /usr/share/man/man1/wsimport-java-1.8.0-openjdk-1.8.0.65-13.b17.fc23.x86_64.1.g jvanek jvanek 16:45:16 ~ $ wsimport -version wsimport version "2.2.9" jvanek jvanek 16:46:34 ~ $ which wsimport /usr/bin/wsimport jvanek jvanek 16:46:43 ~ $ readlink /usr/bin/wsimport /etc/alternatives/wsimport jvanek jvanek 16:46:56 ~ $ readlink -f /usr/bin/wsimport /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.8.0-openjdk-1.8.0.65-13.b17.fc23.x86_64/bin/wsimport So yes, one of us have to miss something:( Sorry for /me not able to get it.
> Javac is master. When you swap javacs, you swap wsimports > It have to be javac's slave, becasue it reside in devel subapackge Hm. I did not known that. My fault. Sorry. And then yes, it is enough.