Bug 745393 - Severely suboptimal timeo option in NFS mount examples (for TCP)
Summary: Severely suboptimal timeo option in NFS mount examples (for TCP)
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Deadline: 2011-10-19
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: doc-Storage_Admin_Guide
Version: 6.1
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Jacquelynn East
QA Contact: ecs-bugs
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 760925
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2011-10-12 08:51 UTC by Laszlo Ersek
Modified: 2015-07-26 22:09 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
: 760925 (view as bug list)
Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-12-07 01:34:16 UTC
Target Upstream Version:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Laszlo Ersek 2011-10-12 08:51:30 UTC
**** Description of problem:

From bug 734188 comment 22:

The RHEL-[3456] guides cite "timeo=14" as an NFS mount parameter. Even though those examples are just syntax help, people tend to cut'n'paste them blindly. "timeo=14" seems to be a very bad choice for TCP.

If you find this bug valid, please consider cloning it for RHEL-[345].

**** Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

Whatever is online currently.

RHEL-3: http://docs.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/3/html/System_Administration_Guide/s1-nfs-mount.html

RHEL-4: http://docs.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/4/html/System_Administration_Guide/Network_File_System_NFS-Mounting_NFS_File_Systems.html

RHEL-5: http://docs.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/5/html/Deployment_Guide/s1-nfs-client-config.html

RHEL-6: http://docs.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6/html/Storage_Administration_Guide/s1-nfs-client-config.html

Thank you very much.

Comment 2 Laszlo Ersek 2011-10-12 08:55:38 UTC
Hello Sachin,

I'm adding you to the CC list, because the RHEL-6 Storage Administration Guide
lists you as NFS contributor.

Thanks.

Comment 8 Paolo Bonzini 2011-10-27 07:39:48 UTC
Should this be cloned for at least RHEL5?


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.