Bug 748062 - v7 1.4 R34 cpuscaling selects wrong measurement method
Summary: v7 1.4 R34 cpuscaling selects wrong measurement method
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Hardware Certification Program
Classification: Retired
Component: Test Suite (tests)
Version: 1.4
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
: ---
Assignee: Greg Nichols
QA Contact: Guangze Bai
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2011-10-21 20:59 UTC by Greg Nichols
Modified: 2015-02-08 21:37 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-11-08 15:43:25 UTC


Attachments (Terms of Use)
cpuscaling patch on R34 to fix aperf/mperf support logic (1.01 KB, patch)
2011-10-21 21:02 UTC, Greg Nichols
no flags Details | Diff
cpuscaling patch to check/load module cpuid on RHEL5 (497 bytes, patch)
2011-10-26 19:59 UTC, Greg Nichols
no flags Details | Diff


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2011:1436 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE v7 bug fix and enhancement update 2011-11-08 23:28:41 UTC

Description Greg Nichols 2011-10-21 20:59:00 UTC
Description of problem:

v7 1.4 R34 selects the wrong measurement method on RHEL6.  The test checks /dev/cpu/0/cpuid for aperf/mperf, but the logic is inverted.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

v7 1.4 R34

Comment 2 Greg Nichols 2011-10-21 21:02:25 UTC
Created attachment 529569 [details]
cpuscaling patch on R34 to fix aperf/mperf support logic

Comment 4 Greg Nichols 2011-10-26 19:59:32 UTC
Created attachment 530374 [details]
cpuscaling patch to check/load module cpuid on RHEL5

It seems that on RHEL 5 i386, the test needs to check and load both msr and cpuid modules to check and use aperf/mperf.

Comment 5 Greg Nichols 2011-10-26 19:59:56 UTC
The above patch is on R35.

Comment 6 Greg Nichols 2011-10-26 20:04:46 UTC
Committed patch on R35 to R36

Comment 11 errata-xmlrpc 2011-11-08 15:43:25 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1436.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.