Hide Forgot
Description of problem: If there is no CS replication agreement between 2 servers, any action to delete it, indicates that it cannot contact the LDAP server. Should instead say - that there is no replication agreement with the server. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): ipa-server-2.1.3-6.el6.x86_64 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.install master, replica do not install CS on replica 2.Remove replication agreement about Replica, where there isn’t one # ipa-csreplica-manage del ipa-replica.testrelm -p XXX Actual results: Error: Unable to delete replica ipa-replica.testrelm: Can't contact LDAP server Expected results: Error: No replication agreement with XXX Additional info:
Upstream ticket: https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/2048
Fixed upstream: master: https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/changeset/7a1399bee1547b85186e010720a90ed6ab2f5e22 ipa-2-2: https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/changeset/bf29b44942160b30eb9ed347bf5b6c8f30418d6e
:: [ PASS ] :: Running 'remoteExec root 10.16.98.181 redhat "ipa-replica-manage del ipaqavma.testrelm.com"' :: [ PASS ] :: Running 'egrep "'ipaqavmd.testrelm.com' has no replication agreement for 'ipaqavma.testrelm.com'" /tmp/remote_exec.out' ... :: [ PASS ] :: Running 'remoteExec root 10.16.98.181 redhat "ipa-csreplica-manage del ipaqavma.testrelm.com -p Secret123"' :: [ PASS ] :: Running 'egrep "'ipaqavmd.testrelm.com' has no replication agreement for 'ipaqavma.testrelm.com'" /tmp/remote_exec.out' Verified: ipa-server-2.2.0-3.el6.x86_64
Technical note added. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team. New Contents: No documentation needed.
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0819.html