Bug 751730 - latest update break rmi
Summary: latest update break rmi
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
Classification: Red Hat
Component: java-1.6.0-openjdk
Version: 5.7
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
high
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Deepak Bhole
QA Contact: BaseOS QE - Apps
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2011-11-07 11:26 UTC by Levente Farkas
Modified: 2012-02-21 06:51 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-02-21 06:51:01 UTC
Target Upstream Version:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Bugzilla 751203 1 None None None 2021-01-20 06:05:38 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2012:0314 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE java-1.6.0-openjdk bug fix and enhancement update 2012-02-21 07:25:16 UTC

Internal Links: 751203

Description Levente Farkas 2011-11-07 11:26:03 UTC
exactly the same true here es in rhel-6.1 #751203
the update
java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-1.23.1.9.10.el5_7
break rmi. ie. even the simplest rmi tutorial example no longer works while it
was working on version:
java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-1.22.1.9.8.el5_6

as it's a regression imho it's critical!

Comment 1 Levente Farkas 2011-11-10 17:38:45 UTC
afert a long debugging it's turn out with the latest java update (el5 and el6 too) it's no longer enough to start 
rmiregistry &
in this way, but you've to explicitly specify the codebase which was not the case before (and take care about the correct " too) eg:
rmiregistry "-J-Djava.rmi.server.codebase=file:///usr/share/java/a.jar file:///usr/share/java/b.jar" &
imho at least a technical addon info would be useful for it...

Comment 2 Levente Farkas 2012-01-10 10:07:58 UTC
at least could you build an src.rm for me for rhel-5.7 to test?
thanks.

Comment 10 Andrei 2012-01-24 20:39:13 UTC
Why is access denied for viewing 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=751203 ?

Comment 11 errata-xmlrpc 2012-02-21 06:51:01 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0314.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.