Bug 754425 - Remove flex expiry code from client side
Summary: Remove flex expiry code from client side
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
Classification: Red Hat
Component: subscription-manager
Version: 5.7
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: rc
: 5.8
Assignee: Bryan Kearney
QA Contact: IDM QE LIST
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 715031 768506 771700 772019
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2011-11-16 13:04 UTC by James Bowes
Modified: 2013-01-10 10:07 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
No description necessary
Clone Of:
: 768506 (view as bug list)
Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-02-21 06:42:55 UTC
Target Upstream Version:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2012:0154 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE subscription-manager bug fix update 2012-02-20 15:06:04 UTC

Description James Bowes 2011-11-16 13:04:55 UTC 
The code related to flex expiry is gone from the server (mostly). Remove it from the client, as well.
Comment 1 Bryan Kearney 2011-11-17 22:25:09 UTC 
*** Bug 754426 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 2 John Sefler 2011-12-19 18:57:29 UTC 
What QE verification do you suggest for this bug?
Comment 3 Chris Duryee 2011-12-19 19:15:26 UTC 
John,

I added a brief comment to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=768506, does that help?
Comment 5 John Sefler 2011-12-20 17:39:14 UTC 
Verification of this bug is mostly on the developer's end since it is a task to clean dead source code surrounding the removal of unused flex expiry code.

Verification that the Flex Expiry OID has been removed from a granted entitlement cert is demonstrated here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=754426#c4

Following the suggestion in comment 3, we will use the results of our automated tests to catch regressions and report new bugs as appropriate.

For now we'll move this bug to VERIFIED since last night's continuous integration automation run encountered no-break results.
Comment 6 William Poteat 2012-01-23 15:05:35 UTC 
    Technical note added. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field
    accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team.
    
    New Contents:
No description necessary
Comment 7 errata-xmlrpc 2012-02-21 06:42:55 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0154.html
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.