Bug 756365 - [xfs/xfstests 262] quota values reported were double what they should have been
Summary: [xfs/xfstests 262] quota values reported were double what they should have been
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
Classification: Red Hat
Component: xfsprogs
Version: 5.8
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Eric Sandeen
QA Contact: Petr Beňas
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 749435
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2011-11-23 11:42 UTC by Eryu Guan
Modified: 2015-01-04 23:01 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version: xfsprogs-2.10.2-8.el5
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of: 749435
Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-01-29 13:01:45 UTC
Target Upstream Version:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2013:0205 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE xfsprogs bug fix update 2013-01-29 18:00:12 UTC

Comment 1 RHEL Program Management 2012-04-02 13:12:06 UTC 
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion
in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux release.  Product Management has
requested further review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for
potential inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux release for currently
deployed products.  This request is not yet committed for inclusion in
a release.
Comment 5 Petr Beňas 2012-08-06 14:23:02 UTC 
Reproduced in xfsprogs-2.10.2-7.el5 and verified in xfsprogs-2.10.2-8.el5.
Comment 6 Eryu Guan 2012-10-16 10:25:58 UTC 
Hi Eric, I found that on xen kernel the hard limit is zero, xfsprogs-2.10.2-7.el5 and xfsprogs-2.10.2-8.el5 got the same result, is that an issue? Thanks!

--- 262.out     2012-08-30 17:32:03.000000000 +0800
+++ 262.out.bad 2012-10-16 18:20:35.000000000 +0800
@@ -1,2 +1,4 @@
 QA output created by 262
 Silence is golden.
+hard limit 0 bytes, expected 524288000
+hard limit 0 bytes, expected 524288000
Ran: 262
Failures: 262
Comment 7 Eric Sandeen 2012-10-17 15:57:34 UTC 
Eryu, I'm not sure what to make of that.  Which xen kernel was it exactly (which arch etc?)
Comment 10 errata-xmlrpc 2013-01-29 13:01:45 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-0205.html
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.