Bug 756491 - Review Request: python-libcloud - Python library that abstracts away differences among multiple cloud provider APIs.
Summary: Review Request: python-libcloud - Python library that abstracts away differen...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
low
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Haïkel Guémar
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2011-11-23 18:56 UTC by Daniel Bruno
Modified: 2014-06-30 19:37 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version: python-libcloud-0.6.2-3.fc16
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-02-08 22:59:05 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
karlthered: fedora-review+
gwync: fedora-cvs+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Daniel Bruno 2011-11-23 18:56:45 UTC
Spec URL: http://dbruno.fedorapeople.org/python-libcloud/python-libcloud.spec
SRPM URL: http://dbruno.fedorapeople.org/python-libcloud/python-liblcoud-0.6.2-2.fc15.src.rpm
Description: libcloud is a client library for interacting with many of the popular cloud server providers.  It was created to make it easy for developers to build products that work between any of the services that it supports.

Comment 1 Daniel Bruno 2011-11-23 19:05:38 UTC
I had a typo on description the correct SRPM URL: http://dbruno.fedorapeople.org/python-libcloud/python-libcloud-0.6.2-2.fc15.src.rpm

Comment 2 Haïkel Guémar 2011-12-06 19:41:27 UTC
Package Review
==============

Key:
- = N/A
x = Pass
! = Fail
! = Not evaluated



==== Generic ====
[x]: MUST Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at
     least one supported architecture.
[x]: MUST All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
     that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[-]: MUST Buildroot is not present
     Note: Buildroot is not needed unless packager plans to package for EPEL5
[x]: MUST Package contains no bundled libraries.
[x]: MUST Changelog in prescribed format.
[-]: MUST Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
     Note: Clean is needed only if supporting EPEL
[x]: MUST Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: MUST Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4
     Note: defattr(....) present in %files section. This is OK if packaging
     for EPEL5. Otherwise not needed
[x]: MUST Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: MUST Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: MUST Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: MUST Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x]: MUST Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: MUST Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: MUST Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags.
[-]: MUST Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
     Note: rm -rf is only needed if supporting EPEL5
[x]: MUST If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
     license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
     license(s) for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: MUST License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x]: MUST Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: MUST Package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Package does not generates any conflict.
[x]: MUST Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: MUST Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: MUST Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: MUST Package installs properly.
[x]: MUST Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[!]: MUST Rpmlint output is silent.

rpmlint python-libcloud-0.6.2-2.fc17.noarch.rpm

python-libcloud.noarch: W: summary-ended-with-dot C A standard Python library that abstracts away differences among multiple cloud provider APIs.
python-libcloud.noarch: E: summary-too-long C A standard Python library that abstracts away differences among multiple cloud provider APIs.
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings.


rpmlint python-libcloud-0.6.2-2.fc17.src.rpm

python-libcloud.src: W: summary-ended-with-dot C A standard Python library that abstracts away differences among multiple cloud provider APIs.
python-libcloud.src: E: summary-too-long C A standard Python library that abstracts away differences among multiple cloud provider APIs.
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings.


[x]: MUST Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
/home/haikel/756491/apache-libcloud-0.6.2.tar.bz2 :
  MD5SUM this package     : f14bc9896fbcedebadddac68b3e11762
  MD5SUM upstream package : f14bc9896fbcedebadddac68b3e11762

[x]: MUST Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: MUST Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[-]: MUST Package contains a SysV-style init script if in need of one.
[x]: MUST File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: SHOULD Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[-]: SHOULD If the source package does not include license text(s) as a
     separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to
     include it.
[x]: SHOULD Dist tag is present.
[-]: SHOULD No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin,
     /usr/sbin.
[x]: SHOULD Final provides and requires are sane (rpm -q --provides and rpm -q
     --requires).
[x]: SHOULD Package functions as described.
[x]: SHOULD Package does not include license text files separate from
     upstream.
[x]: SHOULD SourceX is a working URL.
[-]: SHOULD Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
     translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: SHOULD Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[-]: SHOULD %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: SHOULD Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[x]: SHOULD Spec use %global instead of %define.

Issues:
[!]: MUST Rpmlint output is silent.

rpmlint python-libcloud-0.6.2-2.fc17.noarch.rpm

python-libcloud.noarch: W: summary-ended-with-dot C A standard Python library that abstracts away differences among multiple cloud provider APIs.
python-libcloud.noarch: E: summary-too-long C A standard Python library that abstracts away differences among multiple cloud provider APIs.
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings.


rpmlint python-libcloud-0.6.2-2.fc17.src.rpm

python-libcloud.src: W: summary-ended-with-dot C A standard Python library that abstracts away differences among multiple cloud provider APIs.
python-libcloud.src: E: summary-too-long C A standard Python library that abstracts away differences among multiple cloud provider APIs.
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings.


General and Python specific guidelines are globally respected, you should shorten the summary up to 60 characters (ie: A Python library to address multiple cloud provider APIs) and remove the final dot.
Since it does not provide documentation, i would recommend that you add instead demos and examples as they're self-contained.

Apart the summary defects, there's no other blocker.

Comment 3 Daniel Bruno 2011-12-30 20:38:24 UTC
The summary was standardized.

SPEC URL: http://dbruno.fedorapeople.org/python-libcloud/python-libcloud.spec
SRPM URL: http://dbruno.fedorapeople.org/python-libcloud/python-libcloud-0.6.2-3.fc16.src.rpm

rpmlint output:

1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

Comment 4 Haïkel Guémar 2011-12-31 09:11:52 UTC
All valid points above remains ok and the summary has been fixed so there's no more blocker. I approve python-libcloud to join Fedora Package Collection.

Have a pleasant happy new year eve !

Comment 5 Daniel Bruno 2012-01-03 18:27:04 UTC
New Package SCM Request
=======================
Package Name: python-libcloud
Short Description: A Python library to address multiple cloud provider APIs
Owners: dbruno
Branches: f15 f16 f17
InitialCC:

Comment 6 Gwyn Ciesla 2012-01-03 18:31:57 UTC
Git done (by process-git-requests).

f17==devel, no need to explicitly request.

Comment 7 Haïkel Guémar 2012-01-23 18:21:32 UTC
@Daniel: python-libcloud has been imported and built (F15/16/17) 3 weeks ago but you didn't issue any bodhi requests, so it hasn't even reached updates-testing. Could you fix it as soon as possible so we can close this ticket ?

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2012-01-30 18:00:59 UTC
python-libcloud-0.6.2-3.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-libcloud-0.6.2-3.fc16

Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2012-01-31 22:05:15 UTC
python-libcloud-0.6.2-3.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 testing repository.

Comment 10 Fedora Update System 2012-02-08 22:59:05 UTC
python-libcloud-0.6.2-3.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository.

Comment 11 Daniel Bruno 2013-02-21 04:56:26 UTC
Package Change Request
======================
Package Name: python-libcloud
New Branches: el5 el6
Owners: dbruno

This package is required for saltcloud that will be pushed soon by herlo.

Comment 12 Gwyn Ciesla 2013-02-21 13:22:59 UTC
Git done (by process-git-requests).

Comment 13 Daniel Bruno 2014-06-30 12:26:36 UTC
Package Change Request
======================
Package Name: pkgname
New Branches: epel7
Owners: dbruno terminalmage

Comment 14 Gwyn Ciesla 2014-06-30 12:33:59 UTC
WARNING: Package does not appear to exist in pkgdb currently.

Comment 15 Daniel Bruno 2014-06-30 19:17:09 UTC
I'm sorry, I made a copy/paste mistake.
Follow the correct request:

Package Change Request
======================
Package Name: python-libcloud
New Branches: epel7
Owners: dbruno terminalmage

Comment 16 Gwyn Ciesla 2014-06-30 19:37:25 UTC
Git done (by process-git-requests).


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.