Bug 757663 - FTBFS - libbrlapi_java.so not found during packaging on 64 bit
Summary: FTBFS - libbrlapi_java.so not found during packaging on 64 bit
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: brltty
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Gwyn Ciesla
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2011-11-28 10:22 UTC by Jaroslav Škarvada
Modified: 2012-01-24 18:15 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-01-24 18:13:26 UTC
Type: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)
Workaround for FTBFS on 64 bit (554 bytes, patch)
2011-11-28 10:22 UTC, Jaroslav Škarvada
no flags Details | Diff

Description Jaroslav Škarvada 2011-11-28 10:22:13 UTC
Created attachment 537421 [details]
Workaround for FTBFS on 64 bit

Description of problem:
The package doesn't build from sources on 64 bit, the following error occurred:
RPM build errors:
error: File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/brltty-4.3-1.fc17.x86_64/usr/lib64/java/libbrlapi_java.so
    File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/brltty-4.3-1.fc17.x86_64/usr/lib64/java/libbrlapi_java.so
Child returncode was: 1

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
brltty-4.3-1.fc17

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Rebuild from sources on 64 bit
  
Actual results:
Build fail.

Expected results:
Build pass.

Additional info:
Workaround patch is attached. I am maintainer of brltty in RHEL. I can help you co-maintain / share patches. If you don't mind, I would apply for commit ACL, would it be possible?

Comment 1 Gwyn Ciesla 2012-01-24 18:15:37 UTC
I committed and built another fix for this and then remembered that you'd included a patch.  If you like, you can apply for commit, the more the merrier.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.