Bug 759576 - TPS SRPM Failures Dist Usage Test
Summary: TPS SRPM Failures Dist Usage Test
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
Classification: Red Hat
Component: pam_pkcs11
Version: 5.8
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
high
unspecified
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Bob Relyea
QA Contact: IDM QE LIST
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 758797
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2011-12-02 18:15 UTC by Jenny Severance
Modified: 2012-02-21 05:59 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version: pam_pkcs11-0.5.3-25.el5
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-02-21 05:59:41 UTC
Target Upstream Version:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2012:0215 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE pam_pkcs11 bug fix update 2012-02-20 14:53:18 UTC

Description Jenny Severance 2011-12-02 18:15:59 UTC
Description of problem:

begin at 12/02/2011 12:43:30 on ppcp-5s-m1.ss.eng.bos.redhat.com 
DIST CHECK: %{dist} found instead of %{?dist} in: pam_pkcs11-0.5.3-24.el5.src.rpm.spec Release string was: 24%{dist} 
TPSHINT: Release engineering policy is to use %{?dist}. This is a bug in the package being tested, and should be fixed before release. end test at Fri Dec 2 12:43:30 EST 2011 on ppcp-5s-m1.ss.eng.bos.redhat.com 
TPSRESULT: SPECFILE DIST USAGE TEST Returning: FAIL 


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
pam_pkcs11-0.5.3-24.el5

How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
  
Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 2 Bob Relyea 2011-12-02 21:05:47 UTC
fixed in pam_pkcs11-0.5.3-25.el5

Comment 4 Jenny Severance 2012-01-03 13:52:29 UTC
This is verified : TPS Tests passing

Comment 5 errata-xmlrpc 2012-02-21 05:59:41 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0215.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.