Hide Forgot
Description of problem: "Type" is displayed in Subscription Assistant is not correctly, should be shown the same as "Type" "All Available Subscriptions", when physical and virtual pools are both available. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): # rpm -qa | grep subscription subscription-manager-0.98.5-1.el5 subscription-manager-firstboot-0.98.5-1.el5 subscription-manager-gnome-0.98.5-1.el5 # rpm -qa | grep python-rhsm python-rhsm-0.98.3-1.el5 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1. subscription-manager-gui click "Register System" Input <rhlogin> <pwd> <system_name>, and click register 2. click "Update", then "Subscription Assistant" pop-up. 3. check the result shown in the "subscription" information table. Actual results: The result shows entitlement pools' "Type" is "Physical". attachement will show the detail. Expected results: The result shoud show entitlement pools' "Type" is "Both" when physical and virtual entitlement pool are both available. Additional info:
Created attachment 542504 [details] "Type" show not correctly
Created attachment 542508 [details] attachment displays result of "All Available Subscriptions"
The current plan in RHEL63 is to replace the Subscription Assistant dialog/functionality with a new Service-Level Agreement autosubscribe wizard thereby making this bug no longer applicable.
Created attachment 575510 [details] Subscription Assistant has been replaced by Auto-subscribe/SLA functionality This bug is no longer applicable since the Subscription Assistant has been replaced in rhel63 by the new Auto-subscribe with Service Level agreement settings. [root@jsefler-r63-server ~]# rpm -q subscription-manager subscription-manager-0.99.13-1.el6.x86_64 Moving to VERIFIED
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0804.html