Bug 762339 (GLUSTER-607) - Odd symlink problem on Solaris
Summary: Odd symlink problem on Solaris
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 762353
Alias: GLUSTER-607
Product: GlusterFS
Classification: Community
Component: posix
Version: 2.0.3
Hardware: All
OS: Solaris
low
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Anand Avati
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2010-02-10 04:25 UTC by Anand Avati
Modified: 2015-12-01 16:45 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Anand Avati 2010-02-10 04:25:43 UTC
This might be our setup but I thought I should mention it.

We have three machines in a gluster -- two CentOS 5 machines running 3.0.0 RPMS and a Solaris 10 machine running the latest version (yesterday) from the GIT repository. The Solaris machine uses a ZFS partition so we can take snapshots of what is going on on the other machines (which are development machines). Issues are arising with files which are symlinked into the gluster which are outside the gluster but do not exist on the Solaris machine. I can replicate the problem like this:

mkdir fred
cd fred
ln -s /var/tmp/this-does-not-exist
ls -l
    shows no files
ls -l this-does-not-exist
lrwxrwxrwx 1 shb widearea 28 Feb  8 13:07 this-does-not-exist -> /var/tmp/this-does-not-exist

and on the Solaris machine we get the error:

[2010-02-08 13:07:51] E [posix.c:1834:posix_symlink] posix: lstat failed on /common/fred/this-does-not-exist: No such file or directory

I can 'cure' the problem by removing the Solaris machine and I cannot duplicate this on our other, pure CentOS, gluster.

This looks like a Solaris issue but I cannot see why from looking at the code.

I guess the real question is whether any one else can reproduce this bug using Solaris or whether (as it is quite weird) something to do with us.

TIA
Simon.------
Wide Area Communications
www.widearea.co.uk

Comment 1 Shehjar Tikoo 2010-03-02 07:37:24 UTC
1

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 621 ***


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.