Bug 764312 (GLUSTER-2580) - dbench failed when ran with 20 clients
Summary: dbench failed when ran with 20 clients
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 763544
Alias: GLUSTER-2580
Product: GlusterFS
Classification: Community
Component: distribute
Version: mainline
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
medium
low
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: shishir gowda
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2011-03-23 10:37 UTC by M S Vishwanath Bhat
Modified: 2016-06-01 01:55 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description shishir gowda 2011-03-23 07:56:20 UTC
Please upload/archive the related log files

Comment 1 M S Vishwanath Bhat 2011-03-23 10:37:30 UTC
I got the following error while running the dbench with 20 clients for 1000 secs. I first created a 2 node dht set-up, to which I added a one more brick using add brick. The after rebalance i replaced a brick using replace-brick. Then I got following error.

  20     28858     5.17 MB/sec  execute 342 sec  latency 149.024 ms
  20     28873     5.16 MB/sec  execute 343 sec  latency 152.643 ms
  20     28901     5.16 MB/sec  execute 344 sec  latency 185.746 ms
  20     28928     5.15 MB/sec  execute 345 sec  latency 182.520 ms
[28718] unlink ./clients/client15/~dmtmp/PM/PMC185.TMP failed (No such file or directory) - expected NT_STATUS_OK
ERROR: child 15 failed at line 28718
Child failed with status 1
root@tortuga:/tmp/mnt# [28744] open ./clients/client17/~dmtmp/PM/BDES1.PRN failed for handle 11729 (No such file or directory)
[28849] unlink ./clients/client4/~dmtmp/PM/PMD393.TMP failed (No such file or directory) - expected NT_STATUS_OK
ERROR: child 4 failed at line 28849
[28726] unlink ./clients/client3/~dmtmp/PM/PMC186.TMP failed (No such file or directory) - expected NT_STATUS_OK
ERROR: child 3 failed at line 28726

I observed above error in both distributed and distributed-replicated set-up. It also appears both in fuse and nfs mount.

Comment 2 tcp 2011-03-24 01:28:18 UTC
I think you can simplify the test by using a distribute setup to run dbench and while it is ongoing, just use replace brick. The issue is with replace brick really. This might be a duplicate of 1812.

Comment 3 shishir gowda 2011-03-25 03:55:40 UTC
Moving severity to enhancement, as it is a known issue in rebalance.

Comment 4 shishir gowda 2011-04-07 03:31:50 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1812 ***


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.