Bug 766328 - Make sure that pki component of IPA is properly upgraded
Summary: Make sure that pki component of IPA is properly upgraded
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: pki-core
Version: 6.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Matthew Harmsen
QA Contact: IDM QE LIST
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 736854
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2011-12-11 18:05 UTC by Dmitri Pal
Modified: 2012-04-25 20:51 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-04-25 20:51:22 UTC
Target Upstream Version:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Comment 1 Matthew Harmsen 2011-12-14 22:29:37 UTC
NEEDINFO:

    (1) Does this bug require any code changes to 'pki-core' or 'ipa-pki-theme'?
    (2) If so, does this bug need to be cloned for Dogtag in Fedora?

Comment 2 Dmitri Pal 2011-12-14 22:41:17 UTC
(1) See the tickets. There is currently a problem with upgrades. We need to make sure that such problem does not exist in future. So it requires investigation.
(2) The results of the investigation would produce an answer to this question.

Comment 3 Matthew Harmsen 2012-03-01 01:44:07 UTC
If I understand correctly, the PKI upgrade issue referred to in https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/2117 (closed defect: fixed) was a problem due to Fedora changes related to the relocation of various JNI jar files and have since been resolved (see 'Bugzilla Bug #665576 - "build-classpath swt"', and 'Bugzilla Bug #734590 - Refactor JNI libraries for Fedora 16+ . . .').

Although https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/2148 is not yet resolved, it states that "This only applies to 2.0 -> 2.1 upgrades. RHEL bug is closed as upgrades aren't supported from 2.0 to 2.1."

Although 'Bugzilla Bug #796356 - Upgrading to use proxy frontend should update ports' was filed to address this issue, it does not currently contain any ACK flags for RHEL 6.3.

Comment 7 Nathan Kinder 2012-04-25 20:51:22 UTC
This isn't really a bug, as it doesn't refer to a particular issue or fix that affects RHEL.  This is why it was removed from the advisory.  This should really be closed as NOTABUG.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.