Bugzilla (bugzilla.redhat.com) will be under maintenance for infrastructure upgrades and will not be available on July 31st between 12:30 AM - 05:30 AM UTC. We appreciate your understanding and patience. You can follow status.redhat.com for details.
Bug 76658 - RFE:Distinguish between installed and upgraded packages during version upgrades
Summary: RFE:Distinguish between installed and upgraded packages during version upgrades
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Linux
Classification: Retired
Component: anaconda
Version: 8.0
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Jeremy Katz
QA Contact: Mike McLean
Depends On:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
Reported: 2002-10-24 17:40 UTC by Joe Klemmer
Modified: 2007-03-27 03:58 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2003-07-28 23:14:33 UTC

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Joe Klemmer 2002-10-24 17:40:09 UTC
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0.1)
Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0

Description of problem:
When doing an upgrade from one RH version to another, if one selects to view the
packages you see a list of rpms that can either be checked or unchecked. 
Checked rpms are the ones that anaconda will upgrade to bring you to the new
version.  There is, however, no way to distinguish between packages that are not
installed and packages that are installed but not being upgraded.  It would be
good to have some indicator of what rpms are already installed but not being
upgraded.  An example would be something like this -

[X] nmap      <--- Package being installed/upgraded
[ ] iptables  <--- Package not installed
[#] snort     <--- Package currentlly installed but not needing upgrade

I hope this makes sense.  Please email me if further clarification is needed.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Start an upgrade (i.e. 7.3 to 8.0)
2. Choose to view all packages
3. You will see that any package only has two states and that there's no easy
way to tell if an unselected package is not installed or mearly not in need of

Additional info:

This is something that would really be helpfull for those of us who have been
upgrading systems since RH 2.1.  :-)

Comment 1 Jeremy Katz 2003-07-28 23:14:33 UTC
This isn't a concern with our current interface.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.