Bug 76748 - Component versions in tetex packages are lagging
Component versions in tetex packages are lagging
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Product: Red Hat Linux
Classification: Retired
Component: tetex (Show other bugs)
8.0
i386 Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Tim Waugh
David Lawrence
:
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2002-10-25 15:04 EDT by Michal Jaegermann
Modified: 2007-04-18 12:47 EDT (History)
0 users

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2003-03-25 11:57:41 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Michal Jaegermann 2002-10-25 15:04:45 EDT
Description of Problem:

Red Hat is too conservative for its own good with versions of software
in tetex packages.  For example, in spite of recent updates dvips
is 5.86 from 1999.  The current one is 5.92a and includes various fixes
in particular for partial fonts downloading and support of Type42 fonts.
(bundled with the current tetex sources - see dviware/dvips/README
on CTAN).

For further examples LaTeX is 2000/06/01 version.  Current
texlive7-20020604 (on CTAN, under tex-archive/systems/texlive/)
includes 2001/06/01 coordinated and required with an up-to-date
version of babel (internationalization support).

Texlive7 also sports 3.14159-1.00b-pretest-20020211 of pdftex, Linux
binaries also provided :-), while Red Hat tetex packages still have
3.14159-14h-released-20010417.  At least not that really buggy old
version which languished in Red Hat distributions for way too long.

Yes, I know about "pretest" but authors seem to be slow and overcautious
and newer versions are available ( on CTAN in 
tex-archive/systems/web2c/web2c-7.3.8-pdftex* ).
Comment 1 Tim Waugh 2002-11-08 09:15:38 EST
Upgrading every single little tiny component is just too hard, and historically
we've shipped things like the Japanese patches which don't tend to get ported
very quickly.

I look forward to the next actual teTeX release, due "this year".

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.