Bug 767749 - subscription-manager-migration-data should require subscription-manager-migration
Summary: subscription-manager-migration-data should require subscription-manager-migra...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
Classification: Red Hat
Component: subscription-manager-migration-data
Version: 5.8
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Alex Wood
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 715031 771700 772019
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2011-12-14 19:57 UTC by John Sefler
Modified: 2012-02-21 06:48 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version: subscription-manager-migration-data-1.7-1.el5
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-02-21 06:48:53 UTC
Target Upstream Version:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHEA-2012:0290 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE new package: subscription-manager-migration-data 2012-02-20 15:05:40 UTC

Description John Sefler 2011-12-14 19:57:12 UTC
Description of problem:
Currently the subscription-manager-migration-data.rpm requires subscription-manager.rpm.   Although not bad, I think subscription-manager-migration-data should require subscription-manager-migration which in turn requires subscription-manager already.  I believe this would be an improved chain of package dependencies.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
[root@rhel58-server ~]# rpm -q  subscription-manager-migration-data
subscription-manager-migration-data-1.6-1.el5



How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
[root@rhel58-server ~]# rpm -q subscription-manager-migration-data --requires 
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
subscription-manager  
  
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
EXPECTED THAT TO BE: subscription-manager-migration-data

Following the dependency chain, subscription-manager-migration-data then requires subscription-manager as shown here...

[root@rhel58-server ~]# rpm -q subscription-manager-migration --requires 
/usr/bin/python  
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
subscription-manager = 0.98.5-1.el5

Comment 1 Alex Wood 2011-12-14 20:40:47 UTC
Committed f1230a0f9f01da058fae7933a6404e0330b7269c

Available in subscription-manager-migration-data 1.6+

Comment 4 John Sefler 2011-12-19 18:06:04 UTC
(In reply to comment #0)
Ooops.  I had typos in my expected results....
> Steps to Reproduce:
> [root@rhel58-server ~]# rpm -q subscription-manager-migration-data --requires 
> rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
> rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
> subscription-manager  
> 
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> EXPECTED THAT TO BE: subscription-manager-migration-data
Correction...          subscription-manager-migration
> 
> Following the dependency chain, subscription-manager-migration-data then
Correction...                     subscription-manager-migration
> requires subscription-manager as shown here...

Comment 5 John Sefler 2011-12-19 18:09:21 UTC
Verifying Version...
[root@hp-dl360g7-01 ~]# rpm -q  subscription-manager-migration-data
subscription-manager-migration-data-1.7-1.el5


[root@hp-dl360g7-01 ~]# rpm -q subscription-manager-migration-data --requires
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
subscription-manager-migration  
[root@hp-dl360g7-01 ~]# rpm -q subscription-manager-migration --requires
/usr/bin/python  
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
subscription-manager = 0.98.8-1.el5

^^^ That chain of dependencies  for subscription-manager-migration-data > subscription-manager-migration > subscription-manager makes more sense.

Moving to VERIFIED

Comment 6 errata-xmlrpc 2012-02-21 06:48:53 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2012-0290.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.