Hide Forgot
Description of problem: If a user sets up a non-x86_64 box and has extra channels, they will not get enabled. Steps to Reproduce: 1. register a machine with rhn hosted classic 2. in the web UI, enable supplemental channels 3. run rhn-migrate-classic-to-rhsm Actual results: supplemental channel is not enabled Expected results: supplemental channel should be enabled Additional info: This was found by Mark Huth, who supplied a patch.
a2e8863 master 0.99.3+ 93a1c2f RHEL5.8 0.98.9+
verified using following setup subscription-manager-firstboot-0.99.2-1.git.7.d4c703a.el5_7 subscription-manager-0.99.2-1.git.7.d4c703a.el5_7 subscription-manager-migration-data-1.7-1.el5 subscription-manager-gnome-0.99.2-1.git.7.d4c703a.el5_7 subscription-manager-migration-0.99.2-1.git.7.d4c703a.el5_7 [root@dhcp201-205 ~]# rhn-migrate-classic-to-rhsm RHN Username: stage_test_31 Password: Retrieving existing RHN classic subscription information ... +----------------------------------+ System is currently subscribed to: +----------------------------------+ rhel-i386-client-5 rhel-i386-client-supplementary-5 rhel-i386-client-fastrack-5 rhn-tools-rhel-i386-client-5 List of channels for which certs are being copied rhel-i386-client-5 rhel-i386-client-supplementary-5 rhel-i386-client-fastrack-5 rhn-tools-rhel-i386-client-5 Product Certificates copied successfully to /etc/pki/product !! Preparing to unregister system from RHN classic ... System successfully unregistered from RHN Classic. Attempting to register system to Certificate-based RHN ... The system has been registered with id: d327c7de-1771-4e6e-b970-6005bbb8cd6d System 'dhcp201-205.englab.pnq.redhat.com' successfully registered to Certificate-based RHN. Attempting to auto-subscribe to appropriate subscriptions ... Installed Product Current Status: ProductName: Red Hat Enterprise Linux Desktop Status: Not Subscribed Successfully subscribed.
verified on I386 machine
Moving defect status from modified to verified
Technical note added. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team. New Contents: No description necessary
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0154.html