Bug 768506 - Remove flex expiry code from client side
Summary: Remove flex expiry code from client side
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
Classification: Red Hat
Component: python-rhsm
Version: 5.8
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: rc
: 5.8
Assignee: Bryan Kearney
QA Contact: Entitlement Bugs
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 754425
Blocks: 715031
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2011-12-16 20:35 UTC by Chris Duryee
Modified: 2013-01-10 10:58 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
No Description Needed
Clone Of: 754425
Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-02-21 06:44:37 UTC
Target Upstream Version:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2012:0280 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE python-rhsm bug fix update 2012-02-20 15:06:02 UTC

Description Chris Duryee 2011-12-16 20:35:49 UTC 
bug for making same change in python-rhsm.

QE note: I don't think this is testable, except to confirm that all existing tests pass. The BZ is for removal of unused code.

+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #754425 +++

The code related to flex expiry is gone from the server (mostly). Remove it from the client, as well.

--- Additional comment from bkearney on 2011-11-17 17:25:09 EST ---

*** Bug 754426 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 1 Chris Duryee 2011-12-16 20:36:46 UTC 
08aaa595bb8cdbf59fba3bd70cad4fd26f88166e master 0.99.1
cb21f64f8cf01a903e8143ac288a70fedb4ccd05 RHEL5.8 0.98.7
Comment 2 John Sefler 2011-12-20 17:42:05 UTC 
moving to VERIFIED based on https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=754425#c5
Comment 3 William Poteat 2012-01-27 14:24:06 UTC 
    Technical note added. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field
    accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team.
    
    New Contents:
No Description Needed
Comment 4 errata-xmlrpc 2012-02-21 06:44:37 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0280.html
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.