Red Hat Bugzilla – Bug 769692
Add boundary conditions and overflow detection code in necessary glusterfs library functions
Last modified: 2015-10-22 11:46:38 EDT
Description of problem:
This is placeholder for cleanups in entire glusterfs codebase to ensure proper checks for boundary conditions and overflow detection.
CHANGE: http://review.gluster.com/2556 (libglusterfs: Add boundary conditions to data_to_int8() function.) merged in master by Vijay Bellur (email@example.com)
http://review.gluster.com/#change,2599 - Can this change be reviewed and pushed.
CHANGE: http://review.gluster.com/2599 (libglusterfs/dict: Add boundary conditions) merged in master by Anand Avati (firstname.lastname@example.org)
marking it ON_DEV... this bug can remain open all the time...
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/6115 (libglusterfs: Propositions should be logical) posted (#1) for review on master by Harshavardhana (email@example.com)
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/6115 (libglusterfs: Propositions should be logical) posted (#2) for review on master by Harshavardhana (firstname.lastname@example.org)
COMMIT: http://review.gluster.org/6115 committed in master by Anand Avati (email@example.com)
Author: Harshavardhana <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: Sun Oct 20 21:45:45 2013 -0700
libglusterfs: Propositions should be logical
Mutually exclusive tests shouldn't be
-- (A is B) && (A is not B) is not valid
Signed-off-by: Harshavardhana <email@example.com>
Tested-by: Gluster Build System <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Reviewed-by: Anand Avati <email@example.com>
because of the large number of bugs filed against mainline version\ is ambiguous and about to be removed as a choice.
If you believe this is still a bug, please change the status back to NEW and choose the appropriate, applicable version for it.