Bug 773379 - rhevm still required realm mapping for deployments
Summary: rhevm still required realm mapping for deployments
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: None
Product: CloudForms Cloud Engine
Classification: Retired
Component: aeolus-conductor
Version: 1.0.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: rc
Assignee: Angus Thomas
QA Contact: wes hayutin
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2012-01-11 17:31 UTC by Dave Johnson
Modified: 2012-01-26 12:16 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-01-11 17:41:52 UTC


Attachments (Terms of Use)
ss (110.25 KB, image/png)
2012-01-11 17:32 UTC, Dave Johnson
no flags Details

Description Dave Johnson 2012-01-11 17:31:47 UTC
Description of problem:
==========================
With the recent change of configuring the rhevm provider with the datacenter_id, mapping to a realm should no longer be required since the provider itself points directly at the rhevm realm that instances should be deployed too.  

That isn't the case though, still have to map to a rhevm realm even though configure pointed the provider at it.  It does work this way for vsphere, a realm was not required to launch a imported vsphere image.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
================================================================
aeolus-all-0.8.0-5.el6.noarch
aeolus-conductor-0.8.0-5.el6.noarch
aeolus-conductor-daemons-0.8.0-5.el6.noarch
aeolus-conductor-doc-0.8.0-5.el6.noarch
aeolus-configure-2.5.0-3.el6.noarch
deltacloud-core-0.5.0-0.rc1.el6.noarch
deltacloud-core-ec2-0.5.0-0.rc1.el6.noarch
deltacloud-core-rhevm-0.5.0-0.rc1.el6.noarch
deltacloud-core-vsphere-0.5.0-0.rc1.el6.noarch
rubygem-aeolus-cli-0.3.0-3.el6.noarch
rubygem-aeolus-image-0.3.0-2.el6.noarch
rubygem-deltacloud-client-0.4.0-3.el6.noarch

Comment 1 Dave Johnson 2012-01-11 17:32:49 UTC
Created attachment 552177 [details]
ss

I should have mentioned that the following error is displayed in the web ui when this occurs so at the very least, we should correct it.

Comment 2 Dave Johnson 2012-01-11 17:41:52 UTC
Closing this for a moment


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.