RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 773758 - X display backlight not recoverable
Summary: X display backlight not recoverable
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: kernel
Version: 6.2
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Adam Jackson
QA Contact: Red Hat Kernel QE team
URL:
Whiteboard: CentOS
Depends On: 640421
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2012-01-12 19:57 UTC by R P Herrold
Modified: 2017-12-06 12:10 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of: 640421
Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-12-06 12:10:45 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description R P Herrold 2012-01-12 19:57:11 UTC
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #640421 +++

Description of problem:

The X display backlight can be lost, and is not able to be recovered under certain common scenarios.  The most obvious one is simply running: system-config-display.  In some cases, when a new settings file is tested, the backlight is turned off, and not re-enabled. 


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

version 1.6.5
release 9.36


hardware:
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Core Processor Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 02 )

00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Core Processor Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 02) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
        Subsystem: Dell Unknown device 041b
        Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B-
        Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR-
        Latency: 0
        Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 11
        Region 0: Memory at f0000000 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=4M]
        Region 2: Memory at d0000000 (64-bit, prefetchable) [size=256M]
        Region 4: I/O ports at 1800 [size=8]
        Capabilities: [90] Message Signalled Interrupts: 64bit- Queue=0/0 Enable-
                Address: 00000000 Data: 0000
        Capabilities: [d0] Power Management version 2
                Flags: PMEClk- DSI+ D1- D2- AuxCurrent=0mA PME(D0-,D1-,D2-,D3hot-,D3cold-)
                Status: D0 PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME-
        Capabilities: [a4] 0000013 [0306]

===================

also it seems a brightness issue us being seen in this report:

Is this issues related to my problem, i.e. a new Toshiba A665 laptop with Intel built-in graphics, attempts to install CentOS server 64 bit results in a black screen at the point of 'select language', if you look closely the screen is faintly visible at 1/10 brightness and if you squint hard enough you can give input (mouse etc is active) and the install dutifully proceeds to the 'partition selection' option.


Note: 

looks like this may be some new feature bleeding through that Linux did not 'get the memo' on yet

https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/539477 [^]
http://mjg59.livejournal.com/121851.html [^] 


How reproducible:

1. Run: s.c.d
2. The backlight goes off
3. To recover, one has to ssh into the machine and reboot it, as one simply cannot read the screen


Steps to Reproduce:

   as above

  
Actual results:

Some Intel based laptop video chipsets of recent vintage have a problem with the backlighting not being sufficient (i.e., turned off) in some cases

When manually configured from a 'no prior /etc/X11/xorg.conf' state, low resolution configurations with adequate light can be produced.

When using s-c-d cannot get the backlight work at the end of the config, or a reconfig process

Noting this bug as a tracking point to run this down, to research froward from, and hopefully find a fix or workaround 


Expected results:

desired: the backlight simply works in all cases unless explicity turned off (Xscreen saver type actions for power mgt, etc)

minimal: the backlight is at least minimally on [so that a recovery is possible without rebooting the unit], and a preferred recovery process or tool documented


Additional info:

A. similar 'control of the display bugs here include: #468448  [Lenovo Thinkpad notebooks]
... this bug also implies a later: hal-info may help

B. The reporter on #470455  suggests toggling setting in: adjusting the
/sys/class/backlight/thinkpad_screen/brightness flag (from 0 to 15)

C1. another bug #437267 suggests:  recovered by switching to a VT,
logging in as root and executing:

export DISPLAY=:0
vbetool dpms on

[not possible here, due to the absence of backlight on.  The local unit under test does not have a backlight come on with a switch into a lower VT ...]  (implying yet another component in play -- probably 'kernel' as it controls the local display VT repaints, as I recall)

C2. It also suggests opening a X terminal and:

can you recover by doing 'xset dpms force on' from within the X
session?  (yes, blindly)

again, not possible as one cannot see where to 'mouse to' to fall within a console window ... something like:  F2 konsol <tab> [enter] <on the OK>  [position indeterminate] ... cannot run the xset  ;(

D.  The rebase in #432404 (rhel 5.1) is assumedly fully present, and so no joy there

E.  The Intel drivers seem to be something of a moving target, as the problem of #244933 seems partially relevant here as to a regression slipping in (although, with no backlight, a differing issue)

F. The close of #556385 seems to be a close of an open issue for non-technical reasons (timing) rather than after a fix -- I would clone and reopen it, but it is not my precise case


Endnote:

I file this after seeing a Fedora thread today on this general topic of Intel i810 drivers, and certainly understand that Intel provides lots of ship variations, and so makes for a moving target.  Perhaps some more formal form of drivers updates program is needed? -- I see folks in a couple of the bugs asking for access to testing released on the enterprise platform

If you need specifics, please ask and I will supply as I can

-- Russ herrold

--- Additional comment from herrold on 2012-01-12 14:49:44 EST ---

We find this issue on this same hardware, in the latest kernels in RHEL 6, in that the backlight is not toggled on in 6.2 .... it was fine in 6.0   is this possibly a kernel issue in play>

Comment 3 RHEL Program Management 2012-05-03 05:43:45 UTC
Since RHEL 6.3 External Beta has begun, and this bug remains
unresolved, it has been rejected as it is not proposed as
exception or blocker.

Red Hat invites you to ask your support representative to
propose this request, if appropriate and relevant, in the
next release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux.

Comment 4 R P Herrold 2012-10-19 14:47:39 UTC
This problem continues ... any chance of a fix?

Comment 5 R P Herrold 2013-12-31 16:28:21 UTC
A year later, I still have continuously had this issue through and at 6.5 ... what may I do, or information may I provide, to get this diagnosed and amended?

Comment 6 Jan Kurik 2017-12-06 12:10:45 UTC
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 is in the Production 3 Phase. During the Production 3 Phase, Critical impact Security Advisories (RHSAs) and selected Urgent Priority Bug Fix Advisories (RHBAs) may be released as they become available.

The official life cycle policy can be reviewed here:

http://redhat.com/rhel/lifecycle

This issue does not meet the inclusion criteria for the Production 3 Phase and will be marked as CLOSED/WONTFIX. If this remains a critical requirement, please contact Red Hat Customer Support to request a re-evaluation of the issue, citing a clear business justification. Note that a strong business justification will be required for re-evaluation. Red Hat Customer Support can be contacted via the Red Hat Customer Portal at the following URL:

https://access.redhat.com/


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.