Bug 778904 (SOA-1345) - QE - ESB Administrator's Guide
Summary: QE - ESB Administrator's Guide
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE
Alias: SOA-1345
Product: JBoss Enterprise SOA Platform 4
Classification: JBoss
Component: Documentation
Version: 4.2 CP04
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
high
high
Target Milestone: ---
: 4.2 CP04
Assignee: Dana Mison
QA Contact:
URL: http://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/SOA...
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2009-06-01 02:42 UTC by Dana Mison
Modified: 2009-06-12 15:51 UTC (History)
0 users

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-06-12 15:51:34 UTC
Type: Task

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Bugzilla 778657 0 high CLOSED unclear instructions regarding jUDDI 2021-02-22 00:41:40 UTC
Red Hat Issue Tracker SOA-1345 0 None None None Never

Internal Links: 778657

Description Dana Mison 2009-06-01 02:42:55 UTC 
Affects: Documentation (Ref Guide, User Guide, etc.)
Date of First Response: 2009-06-11 03:19:05
project_key: SOA

QE for changes made for the 4.2.CP04 version of the ESB Administrator's Guide
Comment 1 Dana Mison 2009-06-01 03:20:15 UTC 
Link: Added: This issue depends SOA-1132
Comment 2 Dana Mison 2009-06-01 03:21:42 UTC 
Link: Removed: This issue depends SOA-1132
Comment 3 Dana Mison 2009-06-01 03:21:59 UTC 
Link: Added: This issue is related to SOA-1132
Comment 4 Dana Mison 2009-06-01 03:33:42 UTC 
If something is found not done or not correct in the linked JIRA please reopen it (make sure its assigned to me) & comment there.

Please only put comments here related to any other problems found.
Comment 5 Dana Mison 2009-06-01 03:55:53 UTC 
https://svn.devel.redhat.com/repos/jboss-soa/branches/4.2.0/build-tools/docs/esb/SOA_ESB_Administrators_Guide.pdf
Comment 6 Dana Mison 2009-06-11 00:44:46 UTC 
opps forgot to set to resolved when I reassigned
Comment 7 Pavel Macik 2009-06-11 07:19:05 UTC 
p.7 s. 1.5.: It would look better if the 'Important' block was not divided across two pages.
Comment 8 Dana Mison 2009-06-12 07:53:16 UTC 
Unfortunately we don't have direct control over page layout, we'd either have to insert new content to push it down onto the next page or remove content so it came back up onto the next one.
Comment 9 Len DiMaggio 2009-06-12 15:51:34 UTC 
If there are no other problems in the book we can close this JIRA.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.