Bug 778957 (SOA-1387) - Support multiple queues on jBPM message service
Summary: Support multiple queues on jBPM message service
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: SOA-1387
Product: JBoss Enterprise SOA Platform 4
Classification: JBoss
Component: JBossESB
Version: 4.3 CP01
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
high
high
Target Milestone: ---
: ---
Assignee: Default User
QA Contact:
URL: http://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/SOA...
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2009-06-23 04:58 UTC by Taro Yasuma
Modified: 2010-01-07 15:53 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-01-07 15:53:47 UTC
Type: Feature Request


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Issue Tracker SOA-1387 0 None None None Never

Description Taro Yasuma 2009-06-23 04:58:19 UTC
Date of First Response: 2009-06-23 04:11:53
Help Desk Ticket Reference: https://enterprise.redhat.com/issue-tracker/301752
project_key: SOA

AS-IS)
When you configure JmsMessageServiceFactoryImpl to jBPM message service in 
jbpm.cfg.xml, only one JMS queue is used by this class and current implementation 
of JmsMessageServiceFactoryImpl may be lack of scalability.

TO-BE)
Provide a supported way against message service to support multiple queues rather 
than a single queue for gaining more scalability, particularly load-balancing.

Note that the current jBPM reference guide says JMS for asynchronous architectures
will support multiple queues in future version[1].

[1] http://www.redhat.com/docs/en-US/JBoss_SOA_Platform/4.3.CP01/html-single/JBPM_Reference_Manual/index.html#futuredirections

Comment 2 Kevin Conner 2009-06-23 08:11:53 UTC
There is no intention of supporting multiple queues within the JCA inflow work, scalability and load balancing can already be achieved using a single, clustered, queue.

If there is a particular issue with a particular JMS provider then we should address that issue rather than supporting this functionality.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.