Bug 779354 (SOA-1744) - BPMPRocessor ESB Action properties Documentation issues
Summary: BPMPRocessor ESB Action properties Documentation issues
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 2040112
Alias: SOA-1744
Product: JBoss Enterprise SOA Platform 4
Classification: JBoss
Component: Documentation
Version: 4.3 CP02
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
high
high
Target Milestone: ---
: ---
Assignee: Default User
QA Contact:
URL: http://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/SOA...
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2009-12-21 16:22 UTC by Stelios Koussouris
Modified: 2010-04-05 14:28 UTC (History)
0 users

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-04-05 14:28:14 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Bugzilla 779107 0 high CLOSED Clean up the description of the BpmProcessor in the Programmers Guide 2021-02-22 00:41:40 UTC
Red Hat Issue Tracker SOA-1744 0 None None None Never

Internal Links: 779107

Description Stelios Koussouris 2009-12-21 16:22:59 UTC
Affects: Documentation (Ref Guide, User Guide, etc.)
Date of First Response: 2010-02-25 15:10:20
Help Desk Ticket Reference: https://enterprise.redhat.com/issue-tracker/?module=issues&action=view&tid=375145&gid=1354
project_key: SOA

In section 
12.4.  JBossESB to jBPM

of the Services Guide [1]. It mentions as one of the properties for BPMPRocessor 

"processdefinition" but looking into the org.jboss.soa.esb.services.jbpm.Constants

/product/services/jbpm/src/main/java/org/jboss/soa/esb/services/jbpm

no "processdefinition" property exists but "process-definition-name" (as also in the bpm_orchestraration quickstarts) does exist. Is this a documentation issue and if so can we fix it?

In addition, the description of the "key" property is that it has to be unique. However, it is not made clear that this is not enforced and why? I think mentioning that it is not enforced but it is required for querying the jbpm processinstance would benefit the users. In addition, we could explain that they could define in their DB the r constratint so long as they provided a unique key thereafter.

[1] http://www.redhat.com/docs/en-US/JBoss_SOA_Platform/4.3.CP02/html-single/Services_Guide/index.html#JBossESB_to_jBPM

Comment 1 Stelios Koussouris 2009-12-21 16:58:31 UTC
Help Desk Ticket Reference: Added: https://enterprise.redhat.com/issue-tracker/?module=issues&action=view&tid=375145&gid=1354


Comment 2 Burr Sutter 2010-02-02 00:15:10 UTC
Link: Added: This issue is related to SOA-1506


Comment 3 Anne-Louise Tangring 2010-02-25 20:10:20 UTC
This needs to be closed as a duplicate of SOA-1506


Comment 4 John Graham 2010-04-05 14:28:14 UTC
Per Anne-Louise's comment above. closing as duplicate


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.