Bug 779501 (SOA-1884) - Document recommendation for customers using HP Systinet registry to optimize throughput by using Systinet RMI over remote jUDDI
Summary: Document recommendation for customers using HP Systinet registry to optimize ...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE
Alias: SOA-1884
Product: JBoss Enterprise SOA Platform 5
Classification: JBoss
Component: Documentation
Version: 5.0.2
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
high
high
Target Milestone: ---
: 5.1.0 GA
Assignee: David Le Sage
QA Contact:
URL: http://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/SOA...
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2010-01-26 10:06 UTC by Jiri Sedlacek
Modified: 2015-08-02 23:43 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-03-17 04:56:53 UTC
Type: Task


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Bugzilla 779032 0 high CLOSED Need to incorporate "HP SOA Registry Foundation Integration" into SOA Admin Guide 2021-02-22 00:41:40 UTC
Red Hat Issue Tracker SOA-1884 0 None None None Never

Internal Links: 779032

Description Jiri Sedlacek 2010-01-26 10:06:17 UTC
Complexity: Low
Date of First Response: 2010-01-26 09:42:27
project_key: SOA

SOA-P customers using HP Systinet as their UDDI providers should make use of the RMI libraries supplied for Systinet by JBoss ESB developers, to optimize performance.

Comment 2 Dana Mison 2010-01-29 00:39:32 UTC
Can I get an quick outline of the steps required to configure this: where to find JARs, what config files, sample config etc

Comment 4 Jiri Sedlacek 2010-01-29 11:48:20 UTC
One more note: 

If HP Systinet is used as registry and jUDDI registry is completely removed, system property must be set on a command line (or in run script)

-Djavax.xml.registry.ConnectionFactoryClass=org.apache.ws.scout.registry.ConnectionFactoryImpl 

Comment 5 Len DiMaggio 2010-01-29 12:33:24 UTC
The Systinet doc is here:   https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/SOA-1444

Comment 6 Dana Mison 2010-02-04 01:24:09 UTC
Link: Added: This issue related SOA-1444


Comment 7 Anne-Louise Tangring 2010-12-02 16:26:43 UTC
Not a blocker for SOA 5.1.0

Comment 8 Dana Mison 2010-12-17 03:52:25 UTC
I think this needs to be an update of the kbase article that was created for SOA-1444

Can this be confirmed ?

Comment 9 Dana Mison 2010-12-17 03:52:25 UTC
Labels: Added: kbase
Complexity: Added: Low


Comment 11 Dana Mison 2011-01-05 00:12:23 UTC
Writer: Added: Darrin


Comment 13 David Le Sage 2011-03-17 04:56:53 UTC
I have amended the existing KBase article and submitted the changes for approval.

Comment 14 David Le Sage 2011-03-17 04:56:53 UTC
Release Notes Docs Status: Added: Not Required



Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.