Bug 782045 - kvirc doesn't use system default for menu font size
Summary: kvirc doesn't use system default for menu font size
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: kvirc
Version: 16
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: nucleo
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2012-01-16 12:03 UTC by leigh scott
Modified: 2013-02-13 08:28 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-02-13 08:28:39 UTC
Type: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description leigh scott 2012-01-16 12:03:40 UTC
Description of problem:

kvirc doesn't use system default for menu font size.

The screenshots will demonstrate the issue

http://leigh123linux.fedorapeople.org/pub/screenshots/kvirc.jpg

http://leigh123linux.fedorapeople.org/pub/screenshots/settings.jpg

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

[root@main_pc leigh]# rpm -q kvirc
kvirc-4.0.4-2.fc16.x86_64
[root@main_pc leigh]# 

How reproducible:

Using gnome-shell or cinnamon session with kvirc (fonts set to 11px)


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
  
Actual results:

menu font is larger than the set 11px


Expected results:

I expect 11px fonts in menu


Additional info:

Comment 1 nucleo 2012-01-16 22:22:27 UTC
There was a couple of bugs in kvirc that was fixed by forcing Cleanlooks instead of QGtkStyle
https://svn.kvirc.de/kvirc/changeset/5190

If Cleanlooks will be used in other apps then menu font size will be the same as in kvirc?

Comment 2 leigh scott 2012-01-17 10:17:37 UTC
If I select cleanlooks in qtconfig all my other qt apps including qtconfig start to suffer from the menu issue.
IMO this means another package is faulty not kvirc, can you reassign this bug report to the correct package as I haven't got a clue.

I recompiled kvirc and reverted the Changeset 5190 commit and all is well (I chose a white background, sorted :-)  )

Comment 3 leigh scott 2012-01-17 10:18:40 UTC
P.S thank you for the link.

Comment 4 Fedora End Of Life 2013-01-16 10:09:09 UTC
This message is a reminder that Fedora 16 is nearing its end of life.
Approximately 4 (four) weeks from now Fedora will stop maintaining
and issuing updates for Fedora 16. It is Fedora's policy to close all
bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time
this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 
'version' of '16'.

Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you
plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' 
to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 16's end of life.

Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that 
we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 16 is end of life. If you 
would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it 
against a later version of Fedora, you are encouraged to click on 
"Clone This Bug" and open it against that version of Fedora.

Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's 
lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a 
more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes 
bugs or makes them obsolete.

The process we are following is described here: 
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping

Comment 5 Fedora End Of Life 2013-02-13 08:28:41 UTC
Fedora 16 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2013-02-12. Fedora 16 is 
no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further 
security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug.

If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of 
Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version.

Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.