Bug 782253 - [RFE] p0f v3 (version 3.00b) is available
Summary: [RFE] p0f v3 (version 3.00b) is available
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: p0f
Version: 16
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Kevin Fenzi
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2012-01-16 23:23 UTC by Othman Madjoudj
Modified: 2012-01-19 02:56 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-01-19 02:56:59 UTC
Type: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Spec patch (2.33 KB, text/plain)
2012-01-16 23:23 UTC, Othman Madjoudj 		no flags Details
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Description Othman Madjoudj 2012-01-16 23:23:04 UTC 
Description of problem:

Upstream has released a new version of p0f v3 (version 3.00b):

http://lcamtuf.coredump.cx/p0f3/


This version is a bit different from 2.x, so I attached a patch to update the current spec file.

SRPM: http://athmane.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/p0f-3.00b-9.fc16.src.rpm

Build OK on f16.
Rawhide scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3707377

NB.

There's some issues with the current version like: 

- Incorrect COPYING file (wrong FSF address)
- No manepage for p0f and the other tools.
Comment 1 Othman Madjoudj 2012-01-16 23:23:33 UTC 
Created attachment 555632 [details]
Spec patch
Comment 2 Othman Madjoudj 2012-01-17 02:54:19 UTC 
Release should be 1 not 9, sorry about that.
Comment 3 Kevin Fenzi 2012-01-17 21:12:08 UTC 
Looks fine to me. Happy to apply, or if you would like I can add you as a co-maintainer?

I'd suggest only updating rawhide at this point.
Comment 4 Othman Madjoudj 2012-01-17 21:44:54 UTC 
(In reply to comment #3)
> Looks fine to me. Happy to apply, or if you would like I can add you as a
> co-maintainer?
> 

I'm not yet a packager (still looking for sponsor and my packages not yet reviewed) 

> I'd suggest only updating rawhide at this point.

sounds good.
Comment 5 Kevin Fenzi 2012-01-19 02:56:59 UTC 
Built into rawhide. 

Thanks!
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.