Hide Forgot
Created attachment 556095 [details] ss1 Description of problem: <deployable name='ce-7tmlc'> <description>auto description</description> <assemblies> <assembly name='testVsphere' hwp='default'> <image id='e06efdf0-aa1f-413e-9ae0-622882dfd9ff' build='ffa902b3-b6da-47ba-862a-6cc274b28636' /> </assembly> </assemblies> </deployable> will show "2" images because I have a image id and build <deployable name='ce-cw2mg'> <description>auto description</description> <assemblies> <assembly name='testRHEVM' hwp='rhevmHWP'> <image id='9fba6ed4-c8ce-4190-bc07-7a9fd6e06b7b' /> </assembly> <assembly name='testRHEVM' hwp='rhevmHWP'> <image id='9fba6ed4-c8ce-4190-bc07-7a9fd6e06b7b' build='082ffa0b-602d-4eda-9739-9c6f39c3eb1a' /> </assembly> </assemblies> </deployable> will show "1" and "2" see screenshots This is an error.. right now the number of images should be only "1" [root@qeblade31 ~]# rpm -qa | grep aeolus aeolus-conductor-daemons-0.8.0-7.el6.noarch rubygem-aeolus-image-0.3.0-2.el6.noarch aeolus-configure-2.5.0-4.el6.noarch aeolus-conductor-0.8.0-7.el6.noarch aeolus-all-0.8.0-7.el6.noarch aeolus-conductor-doc-0.8.0-7.el6.noarch rubygem-aeolus-cli-0.3.0-3.el6.noarch
Created attachment 556099 [details] ss2
Fix has been posted on aeolus-devel.org https://fedorahosted.org/pipermail/aeolus-devel/2012-January/008498.html
fixed in commit 9ef3edb24b0d0ac6f43b17e575d44d6f61c5b5a9
Created attachment 561907 [details] image_count
Individual outlines are shown with image count 1 Verified w/ rpm -qa|grep aeolus aeolus-conductor-doc-0.8.0-26.el6.noarch rubygem-aeolus-cli-0.3.0-8.el6.noarch rubygem-aeolus-image-0.3.0-7.el6.noarch aeolus-configure-2.5.0-13.el6.noarch aeolus-conductor-daemons-0.8.0-26.el6.noarch aeolus-conductor-0.8.0-26.el6.noarch aeolus-all-0.8.0-26.el6.noarch
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2012-0583.html