Bug 783963 - Review Request: stringtemplate4 - A Java template engine
Summary: Review Request: stringtemplate4 - A Java template engine
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Alexander Kurtakov
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2012-01-23 11:34 UTC by Stanislav Ochotnicky
Modified: 2012-01-23 17:17 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-01-23 17:17:14 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
akurtako: fedora-review+
gwync: fedora-cvs+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Stanislav Ochotnicky 2012-01-23 11:34:39 UTC
Spec URL: http://sochotni.fedorapeople.org/packages/stringtemplate4.spec
SRPM URL: http://sochotni.fedorapeople.org/packages/stringtemplate4-4.0.4-1.fc16.src.rpm

Description:
StringTemplate is a java template engine (with ports for
C# and Python) for generating source code, web pages,
emails, or any other formatted text output. StringTemplate
is particularly good at multi-targeted code generators,
multiple site skins, and internationalization/localization.

Note: this is a compatibility package complementary to stringtemplate-3.x, because they are incompatible with each other.

Comment 1 Alexander Kurtakov 2012-01-23 11:59:53 UTC
I'll do this one.

Comment 2 Alexander Kurtakov 2012-01-23 12:12:33 UTC
Package Review
==============

Key:
- = N/A
x = Pass
! = Fail
? = Not evaluated



==== Generic ====
[x]: MUST Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at
     least one supported architecture.
[x]: MUST All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
     that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Buildroot is not present
     Note: Unless packager wants to package for EPEL5 this is fine
[x]: MUST Package contains no bundled libraries.
[x]: MUST Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: MUST Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
     Note: Clean would be needed if support for EPEL is required
[x]: MUST Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: MUST Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4
     Note: Note: defattr macros not found. They would be needed for EPEL5
[x]: MUST Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: MUST Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: MUST Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: MUST Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x]: MUST Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: MUST Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: MUST Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags.
[x]: MUST Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
     Note: rm -rf would be needed if support for EPEL5 is required
[x]: MUST If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
     license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
     license(s) for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: MUST License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x]: MUST License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: MUST Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: MUST Package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Package does not generates any conflict.
[x]: MUST Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: MUST Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: MUST Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: MUST Package installs properly.
[x]: MUST Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: MUST Rpmlint output is silent.

stringtemplate4-javadoc.noarch: W: invalid-url URL: http://www.stringtemplate.org/ <urlopen error timed out>
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
Looks like a temporary problem. Opens just fine here.

stringtemplate4.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multi -> mulch, mufti
False positive.

[x]: MUST Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
/home/akurtakov/tmp/783963/DoubleKeyMap.java :
  MD5SUM this package     : b422de9621f3a00f7fd56acdd5fa91ec
  MD5SUM upstream package : b422de9621f3a00f7fd56acdd5fa91ec
/home/akurtakov/tmp/783963/pom.xml :
  MD5SUM this package     : 968120c0d17baf068d7e02b546341332
  MD5SUM upstream package : 968120c0d17baf068d7e02b546341332
/home/akurtakov/tmp/783963/ST-4.0.4-src.zip :
  MD5SUM this package     : de12e824036d04c7fe21a4b056a0957f
  MD5SUM upstream package : de12e824036d04c7fe21a4b056a0957f
/home/akurtakov/tmp/783963/STLexer.tokens :
  MD5SUM this package     : 7881d03359fc08573956dfe45f0d9fc2
  MD5SUM upstream package : 7881d03359fc08573956dfe45f0d9fc2

[x]: MUST Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: MUST Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[-]: MUST Package contains a SysV-style init script if in need of one.
[x]: MUST File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: SHOULD Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[-]: SHOULD If the source package does not include license text(s) as a
     separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to
     include it.
[x]: SHOULD Dist tag is present.
[x]: SHOULD No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin,
     /usr/sbin.
[x]: SHOULD Final provides and requires are sane (rpm -q --provides and rpm -q
     --requires).
[x]: SHOULD Package functions as described.
[x]: SHOULD Package does not include license text files separate from
     upstream.
[x]: SHOULD SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: SHOULD Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
     translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: SHOULD Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[-]: SHOULD %check is present and all tests pass.
[-]: SHOULD Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[x]: SHOULD Spec use %global instead of %define.


==== Java ====
[x]: MUST If source tarball includes bundled jar/class files these need to be
     removed prior to building
[x]: MUST Packages have proper BuildRequires/Requires on jpackage-utils
[x]: MUST Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[x]: MUST Javadoc documentation files are generated and included in -javadoc
     subpackage
[x]: MUST Javadoc subpackages have Requires: jpackage-utils
[x]: MUST Javadocs are placed in %{_javadocdir}/%{name} (no -%{version}
     symlink)
[x]: SHOULD Package has BuildArch: noarch (if possible)
[x]: SHOULD Package uses upstream build method (ant/maven/etc.)


==== Maven ====
[x]: MUST Pom files have correct add_maven_depmap call
     Note: Some add_maven_depmap calls found. Please check if they are correct
[x]: MUST pom files have correct add_maven_depmap call
[x]: MUST Old add_to_maven_depmap macro is not being used
[x]: MUST Packages DOES NOT have Requires(post) and Requires(postun) on
     jpackage-utils for %update_maven_depmap macro
[x]: MUST If package contains pom.xml files install it (including depmaps)
     even when building with ant
[x]: MUST Package DOES NOT use %update_maven_depmap in %post/%postun
[x]: MUST Packages use %{_mavenpomdir} instead of %{_datadir}/maven2/poms

Other comments:
[x] There additional source and grammar files but they are needed because the tarball upstream ships does not contain everything needded to build from it.
Please explain that in a comment.


APPROVED.

Comment 3 Stanislav Ochotnicky 2012-01-23 12:32:52 UTC
Thanks for the review. I'll add a bit more comments explaining some things during commit

New Package SCM Request
=======================
Package Name: stringtemplate4
Short Description: A Java template engine
Owners: sochotni
Branches: 
InitialCC: java-sig

Comment 4 Gwyn Ciesla 2012-01-23 13:14:42 UTC
Git done (by process-git-requests).

Comment 5 Stanislav Ochotnicky 2012-01-23 17:17:14 UTC
Package built:

https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=294930

Thanks for review & repo


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.