Bug 785871 - wrong build dependency on nscd
Summary: wrong build dependency on nscd
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: sssd
Version: 6.3
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Stephen Gallagher
QA Contact: IDM QE LIST
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2012-01-30 20:01 UTC by Stephen Gallagher
Modified: 2020-05-02 16:42 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version: sssd-1.8.0-5.el6
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
No technical note required
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-06-20 11:54:13 UTC
Target Upstream Version:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Github SSSD sssd issues 2171 0 None None None 2020-05-02 16:42:13 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2012:0747 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE sssd bug fix and enhancement update 2012-06-19 19:31:43 UTC

Description Stephen Gallagher 2012-01-30 20:01:47 UTC 
This bug is created as a clone of upstream ticket:
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/1129

We currently have a build dependency on nscd in the contributed spec file.
That's because we use a configure script to find nscd binaries locations.

We should keep the configure check and use it to locate binaries. But we shouldn't have ifdefs in the code. The nscd presence is basically a runtime check, as we do not have a hard depdnency on nscd otherwise.

So when configure checks fails we should simply use a reasonable default settable by a configure switch.

This will allow us to eliminate the BuildRequires on nscd
Comment 1 Jenny Severance 2012-02-24 15:33:58 UTC 
verify Sanity Only, does not after RHEL delivered rpms
Comment 2 Jenny Severance 2012-02-24 15:34:22 UTC 
s/affect/after/
Comment 5 Stephen Gallagher 2012-04-10 16:51:35 UTC 
    Technical note added. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field
    accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team.
    
    New Contents:
No technical note required
Comment 6 Amith 2012-05-29 15:08:11 UTC 
Verified on sssd-1.8.0-28.el6.
This bug has been verified sanity only and no related regressions detected.
Comment 8 errata-xmlrpc 2012-06-20 11:54:13 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0747.html
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.