Bug 785919 - The SPEC file is using the 'Vendor' tag
Summary: The SPEC file is using the 'Vendor' tag
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: qpid-cpp
Version: 6.2
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
unspecified
low
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Ted Ross
QA Contact: Leonid Zhaldybin
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2012-01-30 21:50 UTC by jcpunk
Modified: 2014-11-09 22:38 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version: qpid-cpp-0.14-16.el6
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-06-20 12:13:33 UTC
Target Upstream Version:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Patch to remove the Vendor line (309 bytes, patch)
2012-01-30 21:57 UTC, jcpunk 		no flags Details | Diff
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2012:0764 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE qpid-cpp, python-qpid and saslwrapper bug fix and enhancement update 2012-06-19 19:30:24 UTC

Description jcpunk 2012-01-30 21:50:42 UTC 
Description of problem: The SPEC file has the Vendor tag explicitly set.  This is outside of the packaging standards I'm aware of for RHEL and Fedora.

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Tags

"The Vendor tag should not be used. It is set automatically by the build system."


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):qpid-cpp-0.12-6.el6


How reproducible: 100%


Steps to Reproduce:
1. Open SPEC file
2. Search for Vendor:
3. Find something
  
Actual results:
Vendor is defined

Expected results:
Vendor not in use

Additional info: This may cause rebuilds to incorrectly label the RPMs as being provided by Redhat
Comment 2 jcpunk 2012-01-30 21:57:47 UTC 
Created attachment 558465 [details]
Patch to remove the Vendor line
Comment 5 Leonid Zhaldybin 2012-05-18 07:54:33 UTC 
This was fixed, there is no 'Vendor' tag in the spec file from qpid-cpp-0.14-16.el6.src.rpm.

-> VERIFIED
Comment 7 errata-xmlrpc 2012-06-20 12:13:33 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0764.html
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.