Hide Forgot
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #769512 +++ Description of problem: The command line parameter value of ipv4/ipv6 force using the specified IP version. But when use the ipv6 parameter in the CLI, the addresses reported looks broken, it isn't a valid ipv6 address. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): host info: #uname -r && rpm -q qemu-kvm 2.6.32-220.el6.x86_64 qemu-kvm-0.12.1.2-2.210.el6.x86_64 # rpm -qa | grep spice spice-glib-0.6-2.el6.x86_64 spice-gtk-0.6-2.el6.x86_64 spice-gtk-python-0.6-2.el6.x86_64 spice-client-0.8.2-7.el6.x86_64 spice-vdagent-0.8.1-3.el6.x86_64 spice-server-0.8.2-5.el6.x86_64 How reproducible: 100% Steps to Reproduce: 1. start a guest and force specific ip protocol by using the ipv4/ipv6 parameter. eg: ...-spice disable-ticketing,port=5991,ipv4 -vga qxl ...-spice disable-ticketing,port=5991,ipv6 -vga qxl 2. check whenever spice client and server are using ipv4 or ipv6. for the parameter of ipv4: (qemu) info spice Server: address: 0.0.0.0:5910 auth: none Channel: address: 10.66.8.242:34462 session: 1804289383 channel: 1:0 ... # netstat -ant Active Internet connections (servers and established) Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address State ... tcp 0 0 10.66.9.109:5910 10.66.8.242:34462 ESTABLISHED ... for the parameter of ipv6: (qemu) info spice Server: address: 0.0.0.0:5910 auth: none Channel: address: ::1c00:0:1c00:0%3263259504:55574 session: 1804289383 channel: 1:0 ... # netstat -ant Active Internet connections (servers and established) Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address State ... tcp 0 0 ::ffff:10.66.9.109:5910 ::ffff:10.66.8.242:59698 ESTABLISHED ... Actual results: For the parameter of ipv4,the addresses reported was correctly. For the parameter of ipv6,the addresses reported was broken, it certainly isn't a valid ipv6 address. Expected results: The addresses reported was correctly, or even should display some message at least when was broken. Additional info: --- Additional comment from yhalperi on 2011-12-22 09:58:53 EST --- The title of this bug is confusing. You mean that the "info spice", when the client is connected with ipv6 address, doesn't print the address correctly, right? --- Additional comment from sluo on 2011-12-23 04:14:26 EST --- (In reply to comment #1) > The title of this bug is confusing. > You mean that the "info spice", when the client is connected with ipv6 address, > doesn't print the address correctly, right? Hi Yonit, Because it didn't display the address correctly, so i have no idea how to connect the guest by the ipv6 address. It just didn't display the address correctly(ipv6 addr)by using the "info spice" command in the Monitor. The IPV6 of the host is enabled, but "info spice" cann't print IPV6 info correctly. The ifconfig of host info as following: # ifconfig switch switch Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 78:2B:CB:9A:8C:C9 inet addr:10.66.9.109 Bcast:10.66.11.255 Mask:255.255.252.0 inet6 addr: fe80::7a2b:cbff:fe9a:8cc9/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:184530998 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:88482966 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 RX bytes:301251797212 (280.5 GiB) TX bytes:123991899146 (115.4 GiB) eg: For the parameter of ipv6 (qemu) info spice Server: address: 0.0.0.0:5910 auth: none Channel: address: ::1c00:0:1c00:0%3263259504:55574 session: 1804289383 channel: 1:0 ... In the host: # netstat -ant Active Internet connections (servers and established) Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address State ... tcp 0 0 ::ffff:10.66.9.109:5910 ::ffff:10.66.8.242:59698 ESTABLISHED --- Additional comment from kraxel on 2012-01-03 06:45:38 EST --- Created attachment 550400 [details] rfc partch for spice server Damn. Bug is in the spice server library API. struct sockaddr is simply too small to hold a full ipv6 address. Guess we need a patch like the attached (for spice server), and qemu adaptions to use the new fields (if present) of course.
This bug can be verified only after 769512 fix will be included in qemu-kvm build
VERIFIED on: qemu-kvm-0.12.1.2-2.236.el6.x86_64 spice-server-0.10.1-1.el6.x86_64 $ netstat -putna | grep qemu tcp 0 0 2620:52:0:221d:f2de:f1:3000 :::* LISTEN 6577/qemu-kvm (qemu) info spice Server: address: 2620:52:0:221d:f2de:f1ff:fe04:c0fa:3000 auth: spice Channels: none (qemu) Also added TCMS test case
Hello David I am verifying the issue in the qemu part, that's 769512. I tested with the latest qemu-kvm-0.12.1.2-2.238.el6.x86_64 and spice-server-0.10.1-4.el6.x86_64, but the problem still exists. Steps: 1.Boot guest with "-spice port=5930,disable-ticketing,ipv6 -vga qxl -global qxl-vga.vram_size=33554432" (qemu) info spice Server: address: 0.0.0.0:5930 auth: none Channel: address: ::1c00:0:1c00:0%706150410:50979 session: 1804289383 channel: 1:0 ....... # netstat -ant tcp 0 0 ::ffff:10.66.9.184:5930 ::ffff:10.66.9.184:50980 ESTABLISHED So, do you know what's the difference with your steps and mine? Thanks ~~
(In reply to comment #6) > VERIFIED on: > qemu-kvm-0.12.1.2-2.236.el6.x86_64 > spice-server-0.10.1-1.el6.x86_64 > The fix was introduced only in spice-server-0.10.1-2 > $ netstat -putna | grep qemu > tcp 0 0 2620:52:0:221d:f2de:f1:3000 :::* LISTEN 6577/qemu-kvm > > (qemu) info spice > Server: > address: 2620:52:0:221d:f2de:f1ff:fe04:c0fa:3000 It is not exactly the same address display above + you should also test it we connected client > auth: spice > Channels: none > (qemu) > > > Also added TCMS test case
(In reply to comment #7) > Hello David > I am verifying the issue in the qemu part, that's 769512. I tested with the > latest qemu-kvm-0.12.1.2-2.238.el6.x86_64 and spice-server-0.10.1-4.el6.x86_64, > but the problem still exists. Yonit is right - I overlooked the difference in IPs so the bug is yet to be verified. (In reply to comment #8) > It is not exactly the same address display above + > you should also test it we connected client I don't think so - verifying that address passed on CLI, displayed in qemu monitor and reported by netstat match.
Qunfang, Thanks for the catch!
Marian, welcome and thanks for you guys confirmation ~
Verified on qemu-kvm-0.12.1.2-2.275.el6.x86_64 spice-server-0.10.1-5.el6.x86_64
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0765.html