Hide Forgot
Description of problem: I'm unsure if this is the correct component to report this, but this morning I noticed that my yum update results in a list of packages to be updated, but some of them show incorrect grammar. Examples below: --> Running transaction check ---> Package cifs-utils.x86_64 0:5.2-1.fc16 will be updated ---> Package cifs-utils.x86_64 0:5.3-1.fc16 will be an update <--- e.g.: THIS ONE ---> Package device-mapper.x86_64 0:1.02.65-5.fc16 will be updated ---> Package device-mapper.x86_64 0:1.02.65-6.fc16 will be an update ---> Package device-mapper-event.x86_64 0:1.02.65-5.fc16 will be updated ---> Package device-mapper-event.x86_64 0:1.02.65-6.fc16 will be an update ---> Package device-mapper-event-libs.x86_64 0:1.02.65-5.fc16 will be updated ---> Package device-mapper-event-libs.x86_64 0:1.02.65-6.fc16 will be an update ---> Package device-mapper-libs.x86_64 0:1.02.65-5.fc16 will be updated ---> Package device-mapper-libs.x86_64 0:1.02.65-6.fc16 will be an update ---> Package gnome-bluetooth.x86_64 1:3.2.1-2.fc16 will be updated ---> Package gnome-bluetooth.x86_64 1:3.2.2-1.fc16 will be an update ---> Package gnome-bluetooth-libs.x86_64 1:3.2.1-2.fc16 will be updated ---> Package gnome-bluetooth-libs.x86_64 1:3.2.2-1.fc16 will be an update ---> Package gnome-dvb-daemon.x86_64 0:0.2.5-1.fc16 will be updated ---> Package gnome-dvb-daemon.x86_64 0:0.2.7-1.fc16 will be an update ---> Package krb5-devel.x86_64 0:1.9.2-4.fc16 will be updated ---> Package krb5-devel.x86_64 0:1.9.2-6.fc16 will be an update ---> Package krb5-libs.i686 0:1.9.2-4.fc16 will be updated ---> Package krb5-libs.x86_64 0:1.9.2-4.fc16 will be updated ---> Package krb5-libs.i686 0:1.9.2-6.fc16 will be an update ---> Package krb5-libs.x86_64 0:1.9.2-6.fc16 will be an update ---> Package krb5-workstation.x86_64 0:1.9.2-4.fc16 will be updated ---> Package krb5-workstation.x86_64 0:1.9.2-6.fc16 will be an update ---> Package lvm2.x86_64 0:2.02.86-5.fc16 will be updated ---> Package lvm2.x86_64 0:2.02.86-6.fc16 will be an update ---> Package lvm2-libs.x86_64 0:2.02.86-5.fc16 will be updated ---> Package lvm2-libs.x86_64 0:2.02.86-6.fc16 will be an update ---> Package numpy.x86_64 1:1.6.0-2.1.fc16 will be updated ---> Package numpy.x86_64 1:1.6.1-2.fc16 will be an update ---> Package rhpkg.noarch 0:1.9-1.fc16 will be updated ---> Package rhpkg.noarch 0:1.10-1.fc16 will be an update ---> Package rpm.x86_64 0:4.9.1.2-4.fc16.1 will be updated ---> Package rpm.x86_64 0:4.9.1.2-5.fc16 will be an update ---> Package rpm-build.x86_64 0:4.9.1.2-4.fc16.1 will be updated ---> Package rpm-build.x86_64 0:4.9.1.2-5.fc16 will be an update ---> Package rpm-build-libs.x86_64 0:4.9.1.2-4.fc16.1 will be updated ---> Package rpm-build-libs.x86_64 0:4.9.1.2-5.fc16 will be an update ---> Package rpm-libs.x86_64 0:4.9.1.2-4.fc16.1 will be updated ---> Package rpm-libs.x86_64 0:4.9.1.2-5.fc16 will be an update ---> Package rpm-python.x86_64 0:4.9.1.2-4.fc16.1 will be updated ---> Package rpm-python.x86_64 0:4.9.1.2-5.fc16 will be an update ---> Package xorg-x11-server-Xorg.x86_64 0:1.11.3-1.fc16 will be updated ---> Package xorg-x11-server-Xorg.x86_64 0:1.11.4-1.fc16 will be an update ---> Package xorg-x11-server-common.x86_64 0:1.11.3-1.fc16 will be updated ---> Package xorg-x11-server-common.x86_64 0:1.11.4-1.fc16 will be an update Several packages in the list appear to be appearing as: "<packagename> will be an update" instead of the correct: "<packagename> will be updated" Since this appears in multiple packages above, I elected to create a bug against the distribution component rather than individual components for each package that appears incorrectly. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Unsure. Running Fedora 16 64-bit on a Lenovo T510 machine. How reproducible: Tried only once when updating. Steps to Reproduce: 1. sudo yum update. 2. Wait for list of packages to update to display. 3. Some packages display the incorrect display message.
no - that's correct. ---> Package cifs-utils.x86_64 0:5.2-1.fc16 will be updated ---> Package cifs-utils.x86_64 0:5.3-1.fc16 will be an update <--- e.g.: THIS ONE cifs-utils-5.2-1.fc16 is being updated by the update cifs-utils-5.3-1.fc16 unless there is more nuance here I dont know what you're saying