Bug 790000 - Rebase virt-who to version 0.6 in RHEL 6.3
Summary: Rebase virt-who to version 0.6 in RHEL 6.3
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: virt-who
Version: 6.3
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: rc
: 6.3
Assignee: Radek Novacek
QA Contact: Entitlement Bugs
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2012-02-13 12:54 UTC by Radek Novacek
Modified: 2016-12-01 00:30 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version: virt-who-0.6-1.el6
Doc Type: Rebase: Bug Fixes and Enhancements
Doc Text:
No Documentation needed.
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-06-20 14:14:28 UTC
Target Upstream Version:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2012:0900 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE virt-who bug fix and enhancement update 2012-06-19 20:47:03 UTC

Comment 3 Hui Wang 2012-04-28 07:16:16 UTC 
Verified the bug on rhel6.3-snapshot1.
1. virt-who-0.6-5.el6.noarch on RHEL6.3 re-based virt-who RHEL 5.8.
2. virt-who functional testing test result is PASS as there was no critical regression or test blockers found.

Version:
virt-who-0.6-5.el6.noarch
subscription-manager-0.99.15-1.el6.x86_64
subscription-manager-gnome-0.99.15-1.el6.x86_64
subscription-manager-firstboot-0.99.15-1.el6.x86_64
libvirt-0.9.10-14.el6.x86_64
python-rhsm-0.99.8-1.el6.noarch
katello-headpin-0.1.145-1.el6.noarch
candlepin-tomcat6-0.5.26-1.el6.noarch
candlepin-0.5.26-1.el6.noarch
thumbslug-0.0.21-1.el6.noarch
Comment 4 Radek Novacek 2012-05-02 06:20:14 UTC 
    Technical note added. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field
    accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team.
    
    New Contents:
No Documentation needed.
Comment 5 errata-xmlrpc 2012-06-20 14:14:28 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0900.html
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.