Bug 793720 - lazy page loading for UITabContainer
Summary: lazy page loading for UITabContainer
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: JBoss Enterprise Portal Platform 6
Classification: JBoss
Component: unspecified
Version: unspecified
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
high
high
Target Milestone: ---
: ---
Assignee: Default User
QA Contact:
URL: http://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBE...
Whiteboard: EPP_6_0_0_Candidate
: JBEPP-793 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2011-02-08 15:24 UTC by Gary Hu
Modified: 2018-11-26 18:10 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of: JBEPP-793
Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-04-18 08:14:56 UTC
Type: Feature Request

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Issue Tracker JBEPP-793 0 Major Closed lazy page loading for UITabContainer 2013-04-18 08:13:21 UTC

Description Gary Hu 2011-02-08 15:24:46 UTC 
++ This bug is a clone of bug 793719 ++

Help Desk Ticket Reference: https://na7.salesforce.com/500A0000008ynAf
project_key: JBEPP

The current UITabContainer doesn't support lazy page loading. It loads all the portlets added to it at one time. This brings huge performance issue to one of our enterprise customer. 
Can we add new feature that allows the UITabContainer to load only the page that is on the selected tab? So, the page is loaded only when the tab is clicked.
Comment 2 Jared MORGAN 2011-11-16 23:54:44 UTC 
Release Notes Docs Status: Added: Not Required
Comment 3 Martin Weiler 2011-12-08 12:23:37 UTC 
Help Desk Ticket Reference: Added: https://na7.salesforce.com/500A0000008ynAf
Comment 8 hfnukal@redhat.com 2012-01-12 14:10:45 UTC 
Labels: Added: EPP_5_2_1_Candidate EPP_6_0_0_Candidate
Comment 9 Thomas Heute 2012-01-13 13:19:33 UTC 
Labels: Removed: EPP_5_2_1_Candidate EPP_6_0_0_Candidate Added: EPP_6_0_0_Candidate
Comment 10 Thomas Heute 2012-09-03 11:29:12 UTC 
*** Bug 793719 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 11 Martin Weiler 2013-04-18 08:14:56 UTC 
Closing as Won't Fix, as the underlying GTNPORTAL-1788 has been closed as well.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.