Bug 795451 - Review Request: basex - XML database and XPath/XQuery processor
Summary: Review Request: basex - XML database and XPath/XQuery processor
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2012-02-20 15:18 UTC by dimitar
Modified: 2023-09-14 01:27 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-01-26 12:13:58 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description dimitar 2012-02-20 15:18:18 UTC
Spec URL: https://api.opensuse.org:443/public/source/home:dimitar_popov/BaseX/basex.spec
SRPM URL: http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/dimitar_popov/Fedora_16/src/basex-7.1.1-4.1.src.rpm
Description: BaseX is a very fast and light-weight, yet powerful XML database and
XPath/XQuery processor, including support for the latest W3C Full Text and
Update Recommendations. It supports large XML instances and offers a highly
interactive front-end (basexgui). Apart from two local standalone modes, BaseX
offers a client/server architecture.

Comment 1 Alexander Kurtakov 2012-02-20 16:55:43 UTC
Are you sponsored? If not please block FE-NEEDSPONSOR

* It would be good to keep the build.xml as SourceX instead of catting it in the spec.
* checks like %if 0%{?suse_version} > 1000 make no sense in fedora, we either need it or not
* please install javadocs into %{_javadocdir}/%{name} not in %{_javadocdir}/%{name}-%{version} and drop the symlink/ghost thing
* no need for clean section and cleaning in the install section
* please use desktop-file-install https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Desktop_files
* where did you get Source0 from ? if it's manually created please either add comments on the exact comments to recreate it or add a script for that as SourceX
* I see references to lucene in the spec but it's not BR/R , would you explain?

Comment 2 dimitar 2012-02-26 20:06:20 UTC
Thanks for the comments. I created a new SPEC file from scratch and a new SRPM. I think address all your remarks in the new version, but if there is anything else, I'll fix it.

Spec URL: https://raw.github.com/BaseXdb/basex-dist/master/linux/fedora/basex.spec
SRPM URL: https://raw.github.com/BaseXdb/basex-dist/master/linux/fedora/basex-7.1.1-1.fc16.src.rpm

Comment 3 Jason Tibbitts 2013-05-01 15:43:37 UTC
I am triaging old review tickets.  I can't promise a review if you reply, but by closing out the stale tickets we can devote extra attention to the ones which aren't stale.

This fails to build for me; here is a scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5321604

Comment 4 Mikolaj Izdebski 2015-01-26 12:13:35 UTC
No response from submitter - closing as WONTFIX. Feel free to reopen this once basex is fixed.

Comment 5 Red Hat Bugzilla 2023-09-14 01:27:37 UTC
The needinfo request[s] on this closed bug have been removed as they have been unresolved for 1000 days


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.