Hide Forgot
Description of problem: [root@jsefler-r63-server ~]# rhsm-icon --help | grep -B1 rhsm-icon Usage: rhsm-icon [OPTION...] rhsm icon ^^^^^^^^^ What is this? I suggest the usage statement for rhsm-icon to be this: Usage: rhsm-icon [OPTIONS] Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): [root@jsefler-r63-server ~]# rpm -q --whatprovides `which rhsm-icon` subscription-manager-gnome-0.99.8-1.git.13.1ecb596.el6.x86_64 Additional info: [root@jsefler-r63-server ~]# rhsm-icon --help Usage: rhsm-icon [OPTION...] rhsm icon Help Options: -h, --help Show help options --help-all Show all help options --help-gtk Show GTK+ Options Application Options: -c, --check-period How often to check for validity (in seconds) -d, --debug Show debug messages -f, --force-icon=TYPE Force display of the icon (expired, partial or warning) -i, --check-immediately Run the first status check right away --display=DISPLAY X display to use
moving to 6.4
This request was not resolved in time for the current release. Red Hat invites you to ask your support representative to propose this request, if still desired, for consideration in the next release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux.
This request was erroneously removed from consideration in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.4, which is currently under development. This request will be evaluated for inclusion in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.4.
This seems to have been fixed already somewhere between 1.0.2-1 and 1.0.16-1. In 1.0.16-1, I see this: # rhsm-icon --help Usage: rhsm-icon [OPTION...] in 1.0.2-1, I got "rhsm-icon [OPTION...] rhsm-icon"
the main fix is in. The [OPTION...] part comes from the library, and can notbe changed. Moving to ON_QA to verify.
Verifying Version... [root@jsefler-6 ~]# rpm -q subscription-manager subscription-manager-1.1.10-1.el6.x86_64 [root@jsefler-6 ~]# rhsm-icon --help | grep -B1 rhsm-icon Usage: rhsm-icon [OPTION...] VERIFIED: The extraneous "rhsm icon" string has been removed from the usage statement.
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-0350.html