Bug 796783 - error while importing ami via webui
Summary: error while importing ami via webui
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: CloudForms Cloud Engine
Classification: Retired
Component: aeolus-conductor
Version: 1.0.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
urgent
Target Milestone: beta2
Assignee: Scott Seago
QA Contact: wes hayutin
URL: https://qeblade32.rhq.lab.eng.bos.red...
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2012-02-23 16:24 UTC by wes hayutin
Modified: 2012-12-13 19:49 UTC (History)
7 users (show)

Fixed In Version: v0.8.0-36
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-12-13 19:49:55 UTC
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
import suceessful (244.47 KB, image/png)
2012-02-27 04:51 UTC, Aziza Karol
no flags Details

Description wes hayutin 2012-02-23 16:24:52 UTC
Description of problem:

recreate:
1. setup aeolus for us-east-1
2. in the default cloud, import  ami-41d00528
3. notice error..


The record you tried to access does not exist, it may have been deleted


see screenshot

Comment 4 Richard Su 2012-02-24 00:31:27 UTC
Pushed Scott's changes to master
aeolus-conductor commit c101df303848e481475f4c3ac8f4539e315ae224
aeolus-image-rubygem commit 36298d123ca39ec3c7dd0540e71ff831f18234c3

Comment 5 Steve Linabery 2012-02-24 04:20:30 UTC
4b98ece5b2fadc3331ebdffaee9c874cf2dc3c8a aeolus-image-rubygem
40bb3e9e834a65e65d7032fac7129922feff2b32 aeolus-conductor

Comment 6 Aziza Karol 2012-02-27 04:50:49 UTC
Import via webui successful.

see attached screenshot.

verified:
#rpm -qa | grep aeolus
aeolus-conductor-doc-0.8.0-36.el6.noarch
rubygem-aeolus-cli-0.3.0-10.el6.noarch
aeolus-all-0.8.0-36.el6.noarch
aeolus-conductor-0.8.0-36.el6.noarch
rubygem-aeolus-image-0.3.0-10.el6.noarch
aeolus-configure-2.5.0-15.el6.noarch
aeolus-conductor-daemons-0.8.0-36.el6.noarch

Comment 7 Aziza Karol 2012-02-27 04:51:25 UTC
Created attachment 565949 [details]
import suceessful

Comment 9 Chad Dupuis (Cavium) 2012-05-11 15:27:06 UTC
*** Bug 816492 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 10 Sandesh Patil 2012-06-07 10:00:22 UTC
Hello Chad, 

I think this is mistakenly coupled to 816492. 

Regards
Sandesh


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.